Cited by 813Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Qualitative research and psychological theorizing

Henwood, Karen L., Pidgeon, Nick F.·1992·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Unlike other disciplines in the human sciences, psychology has undervalued the role of qualitative research methods in scientific inquiry. This has done a disservice to psychology, depriving its practitioners of skills which can simultaneously liberate and discipline the theoretical imagination. ‘Grounded theory’ is one useful approach to the systematic generation of theory from qualitative data, and alternative criteria can be advanced for judging the adequacy of research where qualitative methods have been used. An advantage of qualitative research is that theory is generated which is contextually sensitive, persuasive, and relevant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F.
Affiliations
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-02
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
97-111
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2115343912
Cited by
808
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 40
FWCI
49.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
qualitative research, grounded theory, theory generation, psychological research methods
MeSH terms
Documentation, Humans, Psychological Theory, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review