Cited by 47Physical Activity and HealthAging, Health, and DisabilityDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Evaluation of quality of life in elderly healthy subjects after aerobic and/or mental training

Fabre, C., Massé-Biron, J., Chamari, K., Varray, A., Mucci, P., Préfaut, Ch·1999·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

This study proposed different techniques of mental rehabilitation to healthy elderly subjects in order to assess the results in terms of subjectively perceived changes in quality of life. Thirty-two elderly subjects (60-76 years) were assigned to one of the four groups: aerobic training, mental training, combined aerobic and mental training and a control group. Before and after 2 months of training, all subjects took two memory tests. After training, a French validated questionnaire of quality of life was administered individually. Memory parameters such as logical memory (P<0.05), paired associated learning (P=0.05) and memory quotient (P=0.01) were enhanced in all groups except the control group, but in terms of quality of life all the elderly subjects were dissatisfied. VO(2max) and ventilatory threshold were significantly improved in the two groups who were engaged in a physical training program (AT and AMT) and these improvements were associated with a better quality of life in the domain of functional life. Association of the two techniques did not enhance the results for cognitive function. In conclusion, despite objective improvement in cognitive function, all subjects reported dissatisfaction in terms of improvement in quality of life, whatever their assigned group. Nevertheless, an improvement in quality of life was acknowledged after aerobic training for the physical component of functional life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-4943(98)00118-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabre, C., Massé-Biron, J., Chamari, K., Varray, A., Mucci, P., & Préfaut, C.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve (FR)
  • Université de Montpellier (FR)
Corresponding author
Fabre, C.
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
9-22
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066217647
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
quality of life, older adults, aerobic exercise, mental training, cognitive function, memory, VO2max, ventilatory threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review