Cited by 719Physical Activity and HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Exercise, cognition, and the aging brain

Kramer, Arthur F., Erickson, Kirk I., Colcombe, Stanley J.·2006·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

We provide a brief review of the literature on exercise effects on brain and cognition. To this end, we focus on both prospective and retrospective human epidemiological studies that have examined the influence of exercise and physical activity on cognition and dementia. We then examine the relatively small set of human randomized clinical trials that have, for the most part, focused on exercise training effects on cognition. Next, we discuss animal research that has examined the molecular, cellular, and behavioral effects of exercise training. Finally, we conclude with a summary and brief discussion of important future directions of research on fitness cognition and brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00500.2006

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These improvements extended to corresponding increases in the activity of supporting prefrontal cortical substrates, further replicating seminal findings on the neurocognitive benefit of physical activity.

    “These improvements extended to corresponding increases in the activity of supporting prefrontal cortical substrates, further replicate seminal findings on the neurocognitive benefit of physical activity (26–28).”
  • Aerobic exercise may have important clinical relevance in counteracting the cognitive decline associated with aging or dementia.

    “The capacity to promote cognitive performance in this way implies that AE may have an important clinical relevance in counteracting the cognitive decline associated with aging or dementia (Kramer et al., 2006) and has catalyzed its systematic investigation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kramer, A. F., Erickson, K. I., & Colcombe, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Kramer, Arthur F.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2006-10
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
1237-1242
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W16778001
Cited by
719
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 67
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG025032, R01AG25032, R37 AG-25667, R37AG025667)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
physical activity, cognition, brain aging, dementia, exercise training, brain health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Aging, Animals, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Physical Fitness, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review