The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tumour oxygenation levels correlate with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters in carcinoma of the cervix
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The Eppendorf pO(2) histograph is the 'gold standard' method for measuring tumour oxygenation. The method is not suitable for widespread application because its use is limited to accessible tumours. A non-invasive imaging technique would be an attractive alternative. Therefore, the relationships between tumour oxygenation and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study comprised 30 patients with carcinoma of the cervix. Tumour oxygenation was measured pre-treatment as median pO(2) and the proportion of values less than 5 mmHg (HP5) using a pO(2) histograph. Repeat measurements were obtained for nine patients following 40-45 Gy external beam radiotherapy giving a total of 39 measurements. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using gadolinium was performed prior to obtaining the oxygenation data. Time/signal intensity curves were generated to obtain two standard parameters: maximum enhancement over baseline (SI-I) and the rate of enhancement (SI-I/s). RESULTS Using the 39 measurements, there was a significant correlation between SI-I and both median pO(2) (r=0.59; P<0.001) and HP5 (r=-0. 49; P=0.002). There was a weak, borderline significant correlation between SI-I/s and both median pO(2) (r=0.29; P=0.071) and HP5 (r=-0. 34; P=0.037). There was a significant relationship between tumour size and SI-I (r=0.54; P<0.001), but not SI-I/s. In 29 tumours, where data were available, there was no relationship between histological assessment of tumour angiogenesis (intra-tumour microvessel density; IMD) and either MRI parameter. CONCLUSIONS Tumour oxygenation levels measured using a pO(2) histograph correlate with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters. Therefore, non-invasive dynamic MRI may be a method for measuring hypoxia in human tumours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome
Vaupel, P., & Mayer, A. (2007) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-007-9055-1 · Cited by 2,240
Detection and Characterization of Tumor Hypoxia Using pO 2 Histography
Vaupel, P., Höckel, M., & Mayer, A. (2007) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2007.1628 · Cited by 728
Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome
Horsman, M. R., Mortensen, L. S., Petersen, J. B., Busk, M., & Overgaard, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.171 · Cited by 614
Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions
Padhani, A. R. (2002) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.10176 · Cited by 472
Dimopoulos, J. C. A., Petrow, P., Tanderup, K., Petric, P., Berger, D., Kirisits, C., Pedersen, E. M., van Limbergen, E., Haie-Meder, C., & Pötter, R. (2012) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.024 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, R. A., Carrington, B. M., Loncaster, J. A., Todd, S. M., Davidson, S. E., Logue, J. P., Luthra, A. D., Jones, A. P., Stratford, I., Hunter, R. D., & West, C. M. L.
- Venue
- Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-59
- ISSN
- 0167-8140 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115485662
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumour oxygenation levels correlate with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters in carcinoma of the cervix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00259-0
- The paper
- Cooper, R. A., Carrington, B. M., Loncaster, J. A., Todd, S. M., Davidson, S. E., Logue, J. P., Luthra, A. D., Jones, A. P., Stratford, I., Hunter, R. D., & West, C. M. L. (2000). Tumour oxygenation levels correlate with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters in carcinoma of the cervix. Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00259-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.