The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions
Abstract
Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) is performed after the administration of intravenous contrast medium to noninvasively access tumor vascular characteristics. DCE‐MRI techniques utilizing low‐molecular‐weight contrast media have successfully made the transition from methodological development to preclinical and clinical validation and are now rapidly becoming mainstream clinical tools. DCE‐MRI using macromolecular contrast medium (MMCM) can also assay microvascular characteristics of human tumor xenografts. MMCM approval for human use will occur soon. The success of both techniques depends on their ability to demonstrate quantitative differences of contrast medium behavior in a variety of tissues. Evidence is mounting that kinetic parameters correlate with immunohistochemical surrogates of tumor angiogenesis, including microvessel density, and with pathologic tumor grade. DCE‐MRI is being applied to monitor the clinical effectiveness of a variety of treatments, including antiangiogenic drugs. Kinetic parameter changes following treatment have correlated with histopathological outcome and patient survival. This article reviews the current clinical status of low‐molecular‐weight DCE‐MRI and reviews the potential of MMCM techniques for evaluating human tumors. Ongoing challenges faced by DCE‐MRI as clinical and research tools will be explored. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;16:407–422. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y.-X. J., Hussain, S. M., & Krestin, G. P. (2001) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300100908 · Cited by 1,381
Methodology of brain perfusion imaging
Barbier, E. L., Lamalle, L., & Décorps, M. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1073 · Cited by 404
Wenz, F., Rempp, K., Brix, G., Knopp, M. V., Gückel, F., Heß, T., & van Kaick, G. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(95)02058-2 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Deformable medical image registration: a survey
Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., & Paragios, N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2265603 · Cited by 1,587
“perfusion imaging for cancer characterization and treatment) that convey great clinical information and have important diagnostic value [3, 4].”
BackgroundLeach, M. O., Brindle, K. M., Evelhoch, J. L., Griffiths, J. R., Horsman, M. R., Jackson, A., Jayson, G. C., Judson, I. R., Knopp, M. V., Maxwell, R. J., et al. (2005) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602550 · Cited by 513
Self-citationLobatto, M. E., Fayad, Z. A., Silvera, S., Vucic, E., Calcagno, C., Mani, V., Dickson, S. D., Nicolay, K., Banciu, M., Schiffelers, R. M., et al. (2010) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp100309y · Cited by 170
In Vivo mouse imaging and spectroscopy in drug discovery
Beckmann, N., Kneuer, R., Gremlich, H., Karmouty‐Quintana, H., Blé, F., & Müller, M. (2007) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1153 · Cited by 118
Review of Photoacoustic Flow Imaging: Its Current State and Its Promises
van den Berg, P. J., Daoudi, K., & Steenbergen, W. (2015) · Photoacoustics · doi:10.1016/j.pacs.2015.08.001 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Padhani, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-25
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-422
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2119671639
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.10176
- The paper
- Padhani, A. R. (2002). Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.