Cited by 126Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Functional connectivity of gamma EEG activity is modulated at low frequency during conscious recollection

Burgess, Adrian P, Ali, Lia·2002·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

We examined two subjectively distinct memory states that are elicited during recognition memory in humans and compared them in terms of the gamma oscillations (20-60 Hz) in the electroencepahalogram (EEG) that they induced. These subjective states, 'recollection' and 'familiarity' both entail correct recognition but one involves a clear and conscious recollection of the event including memory for contextual detail whilst the other involves a sense of familiarity without clear recollection. Here we show that during a verbal recognition memory test, the subjective experience of 'recollection' induced higher amplitude gamma oscillations than the subjective experience of 'familiarity' in the time period 300-500 ms after stimulus presentation. Recollection, but not familiarity, was also associated with greater functional connectivity in the gamma frequency range between frontal and parietal sites. Furthermore, the magnitude of the gamma functional connectivity varied over time and was modulated at 3 Hz. Previous studies in animals have shown local theta frequency modulation (3-7 Hz) of gamma-oscillations but this is the first time that a similar effect has been reported in the human EEG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00108-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fast wave oscillations in neuron assemblies in one part of the brain sometimes co-vary with fast wave oscillations in more distant parts of the brain.

    “It has been observed for example, that fast wave oscillations in neuron assemblies in one part of the brain sometimes co-vary with fast wave oscillations more distant parts of the brain (Burgess & Ali, 2002; Castro et al., 2014; Zhang, Gan, & Wang, 2014).”

    From Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability (2015) · cites this paper as Burgess & Ali, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgess, A. P., & Ali, L.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Adrian P
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
91-100
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171623630
Cited by
126
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
gamma oscillations, functional connectivity, conscious recollection, familiarity, recognition memory, frontoparietal connectivity, low-frequency modulation, verbal recognition memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Parietal Lobe, Psychological Theory, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review