Functional connectivity of gamma EEG activity is modulated at low frequency during conscious recollection
Abstract
We examined two subjectively distinct memory states that are elicited during recognition memory in humans and compared them in terms of the gamma oscillations (20-60 Hz) in the electroencepahalogram (EEG) that they induced. These subjective states, 'recollection' and 'familiarity' both entail correct recognition but one involves a clear and conscious recollection of the event including memory for contextual detail whilst the other involves a sense of familiarity without clear recollection. Here we show that during a verbal recognition memory test, the subjective experience of 'recollection' induced higher amplitude gamma oscillations than the subjective experience of 'familiarity' in the time period 300-500 ms after stimulus presentation. Recollection, but not familiarity, was also associated with greater functional connectivity in the gamma frequency range between frontal and parietal sites. Furthermore, the magnitude of the gamma functional connectivity varied over time and was modulated at 3 Hz. Previous studies in animals have shown local theta frequency modulation (3-7 Hz) of gamma-oscillations but this is the first time that a similar effect has been reported in the human EEG.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fast wave oscillations in neuron assemblies in one part of the brain sometimes co-vary with fast wave oscillations in more distant parts of the brain.
“It has been observed for example, that fast wave oscillations in neuron assemblies in one part of the brain sometimes co-vary with fast wave oscillations more distant parts of the brain (Burgess & Ali, 2002; Castro et al., 2014; Zhang, Gan, & Wang, 2014).”
From Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability (2015) · cites this paper as Burgess & Ali, 2002
Cites
Tulving, E. (1985) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/h0080017 · Cited by 4,638 · see citing works
The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282 · see citing works
von Stein, A., & Sarnthein, J. (2000) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00172-0 · Cited by 1,553 · see citing works
Asada, H., Fukuda, Y., Tsunoda, S., Yamaguchi, M., & Tonoike, M. (1999) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00679-5 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Episodic memory and beyond: the hippocampus and neocortex in transformation
Moscovitch, M., Cabeza, R., Winocur, G., & Nadel, L. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143733 · Cited by 1,062 · see citing works
Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes
Ward, L. M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.012 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Bailey, N. W., Hoy, K. E., Rogasch, N. C., Thomson, R. H., McQueen, S., Elliot, D., Sullivan, C. M., Fulcher, B. D., Daskalakis, Z. J., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2018) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.015 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Lehmann, D., Faber, P. L., Tei, S., Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Milz, P., & Kochi, K. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.042 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Neural Correlates of Three Promising Endophenotypes of Depression: Evidence from the EMBARC Study
Webb, C. A., Dillon, D. G., Pechtel, P., Goer, F. K., Murray, L., Huys, Q. J., Fava, M., McGrath, P. J., Weissman, M., Parsey, R., et al. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.165 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability
Jensen, M. P., Adachi, T., & Hakimian, S. (2015) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.976786 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burgess, A. P., & Ali, L.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Burgess, Adrian P
- ORCID
- Burgess, Adrian P
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-100
- ISSN
- 0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171623630
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- gamma oscillations, functional connectivity, conscious recollection, familiarity, recognition memory, frontoparietal connectivity, low-frequency modulation, verbal recognition memory
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Parietal Lobe, Psychological Theory, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review