The influence of environmental change on the behaviour of sheltered dogs
Abstract
The majority of sheltered dogs are overlooked for purchase because they are considered undesirable by potential buyers. Many factors may determine a dog's appeal, although of interest here are the dog's behaviour and cage environment which can influence its desirability. People prefer dogs which are at the front rather than the back of the cage, quiet as opposed to barking, and alert rather than non-alert. Potential buyers also prefer dogs which are held in complex as opposed to barren environments. This study examined the behaviour of sheltered dogs in response to environmental change, to determine whether it influenced dog behaviour in ways that could be perceived as desirable to potential dog buyers, and/or had any effect upon the incidence of dogs purchased from the shelter. One hundred and twenty dogs sheltered by the Ulster Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals were studied over a 4-h period. The dogs' position in the cage, vocalisation, and activity were investigated in response to increased human social stimulation, moving the dog's bed to the front of the cage, or suspending a toy from the front of the dog's cage. Social stimulation resulted in dogs spending more time at the front of the enclosure, more time standing, and slightly more time barking. Moving the bed to the front of the cage encouraged dogs to this position, but did not influence activity or vocalisation. Suspending a toy at the front of the pen exerted no effect on dog behaviour, although it…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Persistent behaviors may be redirected toward inanimate objects and people, and may escalate to aggressive-like behaviors, posing a risk to animal and human safety and increasing risk of euthanasia.
“Persistent behaviors may be redirected toward inanimate objects (e.g., destructive chewing of toys, beds) and people (e.g., nipping, mouthing), and may escalate to aggressive-like behaviors (snapping, biting) (13), posing a risk to animal and human safety, increasing risk of euthanasia (17–19).”
From Combined enrichment and pharmaceutical intervention reduces excessive arousal in shelter dogs in a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Displays of excessive arousal can be undesirable to potential adopters, resulting in an increased length of stay in the animal shelter.
“Further, displays of excessive arousal (e.g., vocalizations, repetitive movement back-and-forth) can also be undesirable to potential adopters, resulting in an increased length of stay in the animal shelter (17–19).”
From Combined enrichment and pharmaceutical intervention reduces excessive arousal in shelter dogs in a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Audit of Behavioral Indicators of Poor Welfare in Kenneled Dogs in the United Kingdom
Stephen, J. M., & Ledger, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1207/s15327604jaws0802_1 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Blaney, E., & Wells, D. (2004) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600026841 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citation‘The effect of different genres of music on the stress levels of kennelled dogs’
Bowman, A., Dowell, F. J., & Evans, N. P. (2017) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.01.024 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Cisneros, A., O’Hanley, K., Moody, C. M., & Stellato, A. C. (2026) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2026.1931203
“Persistent behaviors may be redirected toward inanimate objects (e.g., destructive chewing of toys, beds) and people (e.g., nipping, mouthing), and may escalate to aggressive-like behaviors (snapping, biting) (13), posing a risk to animal and human safety, increasing risk of euthanasia (17–19).”
- Authors
- Wells, D. L., & Hepper, P. G.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wells, Deborah L
- ORCID
- Wells, Deborah L
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-162
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028067986
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Keywords
- shelter dogs, dog behavior, cage environment, environmental enrichment, dog adoption, barking, vocalizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review