Cited by 441Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows

Open access
Breuer, K, Hemsworth, P.H, Barnett, J.L, Matthews, L.R, Coleman, G.J·2000·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Abstract

This study examined the relationships between the attitude and the behaviour of the stockperson towards cows and the behavioural response to humans and the milk production of cows at 31 commercial dairy farms over one lactation. The attitude of the stockperson was measured on the basis of the stockperson's opinion of the cow's behaviour and how the stockperson evaluated his own behaviour. The behaviour of the stockperson was measured by recording the nature and frequency of the tactile interactions and some visual and auditory interactions directed towards the cows. The behavioural response of cows to humans was assessed by observing their approach behaviour to an unfamiliar experimenter in a standard test and production records were collected for the entire lactation at each farm. Correlation and regression analyses using farm averages were used to examine relationships between human and cow variables. Several cow behaviour variables, indicative of fear of humans, were moderately (P<0.05) to highly (P<0.01) correlated with milk yield and composition and regression analysis indicated that fear of humans accounted for 19% of the variation in milk yield between farms. The results suggest that at farms where milk yield was low, cows showed less approach to the experimenter in the standard fear test than at farms where milk yield was higher. A composite attitude score, based on the responses of stockpeople to questions about patting and talking to cows, ease of movement of cows a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00097-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At dairy farms where milk yield was low, cows showed greater fear of humans as measured by human approach tests.

    “For example, Breuer et al. [20] found that at dairy farms where milk yield was low, cows showed greater fear of humans, as measured by human approach tests.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breuer, K., Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L., Matthews, L. R., & Coleman, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Agriculture Victoria (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • AgResearch (NZ)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hemsworth, P.H
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
273-288
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977554274
Cited by
441
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Keywords
dairy cattle, fear of humans, milk yield, milk composition, cow welfare, touch interaction, commercial dairy farms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review