The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current and future applications of flow cytometry in aquatic microbiology
Open accessAbstract
Flow cytometry has become a valuable tool in aquatic and environmental microbiology that combines direct and rapid assays to determine numbers, cell size distribution and additional biochemical and physiological characteristics of individual cells, revealing the heterogeneity present in a population or community. Flow cytometry exhibits three unique technical properties of high potential to study the microbiology of aquatic systems: (i) its tremendous velocity to obtain and process data; (ii) the sorting capacity of some cytometers, which allows the transfer of specific populations or even single cells to a determined location, thus allowing further physical, chemical, biological or molecular analysis; and (iii) high-speed multiparametric data acquisition and multivariate data analysis. Flow cytometry is now commonly used in aquatic microbiology, although the application of cell sorting to microbial ecology and quantification of heterotrophic nanoflagellates and viruses is still under development. The recent development of laser scanning cytometry also provides a new way to further analyse sorted cells or cells recovered on filter membranes or slides. The main infrastructure limitations of flow cytometry are: cost, need for skilled and well-trained operators, and adequate refrigeration systems for high-powered lasers and cell sorters. The selection and obtaining of the optimal fluorochromes, control microorganisms and validations for a specific application may sometimes be difficult to accomplish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The antibacterial mechanism of carvacrol and thymol against Escherichia coli
Xu, J., Zhou, F., Ji, B.-P., Pei, R.-S., & Xu, N. (2008) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02407.x · Cited by 633
Bouhdid, S., Abrini, J., Zhiri, A., Espuny, M. J., & Manresa, A. (2009) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04124.x · Cited by 173
Paparella, A., Taccogna, L., Aguzzi, I., Chaves-López, C., Serio, A., Marsilio, F., & Suzzi, G. (2008) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.01.002 · Cited by 152
Methods to quantify biological contaminants in microalgae cultures
Di Caprio, F. (2020) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2020.101943 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Vives-Rego, J.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 429-448
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080516713
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current and future applications of flow cytometry in aquatic microbiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00033-4
- The paper
- Vives-Rego, J. (2000). Current and future applications of flow cytometry in aquatic microbiology. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00033-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.