Cited by 199Liver Diseases and ImmunityDermatology and Skin DiseasesPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments

Efficacy and safety of oral naltrexone treatment for pruritus of cholestasis, a crossover, double blind, placebo-controlled study

Terg, Rubén, Coronel, Emma, Sordá, Juan, Muñoz, Alberto E, Findor, Jorge·2002·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

Background/aims To assess the efficacy and safety of naltrexone for the short and long term treatment of pruritus of cholestasis. Methods Twenty patients with pruritus and cholestasis were included. A baseline pruritus score was obtained over 1 week. Patients were then randomized to receive 50 mg/day of naltrexone or placebo for 2 weeks. Subsequently, a 1-week washout period ensued and patients were crossed over to the other therapy for 2 additional weeks. Pruritus was assessed daily with a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Patients whose pruritus decreased >50% of basal with naltrexone received naltrexone 50 mg/day for 2 additional months. Results Mean basal VAS was similar in both groups. VAS showed greater and more significant changes with naltrexone than with placebo (P<0.0003). In nine out of 20 patients (45%) receiving naltrexone, pruritus decreased >50% compared to basal value, including five whose pruritus disappeared completely. No significant changes were observed in serum biochemistry. Most of the adverse events that occurred during the first 48 h of naltrexone therapy were consistent with opioid withdrawal-like phenomena and spontaneously disappeared 2 days after starting treatment. Conclusions Naltrexone can be considered as an alternative option to treat pruritus of cholestasis. In the current study, side effects were transient and did not require specific medication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00318-5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opiate antagonists (oral naltrexone and parenteral naloxone) are increasingly used as third-line therapy as they reduce the sensation of itching and scratching activity.

    “Opiate antagonists (oral naltrexone and parenteral naloxone) are increasingly used as third-line therapy as they reduce the sensation of itching and scratching activity.186 190–192”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terg, R., Coronel, E., Sordá, J., Muñoz, A. E., & Findor, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad del Salvador (AR)
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
Corresponding author
Terg, Rubén
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
717-722
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043872663
Cited by
199
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
naltrexone, cholestatic pruritus, opioid antagonists, opioid withdrawal, adverse events, placebo-controlled crossover trial
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Cholestasis, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Pain Measurement, Pruritus, Safety, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review