Cited by 235Liver Diseases and ImmunityDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments

Effects of long-term rifampicin administration in primary biliary cirrhosis

Open access
Bachs, Laura, Parés, Albert, Elena, Montserrat, Piera, Carlos, Rodés, Joan·1992·Gastroenterology

Abstract

The effects of rifampicin treatment (10 mg.kg-1.day-1) on pruritus and cholestasis were evaluated in 16 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and pruritus followed up for 2-24 months. Assessment of pruritus severity, liver tests, aminopyrine breath test, and bile acids was done at 2 weeks and every 3 months after the beginning of the study. Two patients (12.5%) were withdrawn after 2 months of treatment because they had hepatitis caused by rifampicin. Four patients were withdrawn after 4 months because of liver transplantation (3 cases) and the development of leg edema associated with administration of rifampicin. The remaining 10 patients received therapy for 14.4 +/- 0.7 months and did not experience side effects. Pruritus improved in all patients and disappeared in 11 patients (79%) after 3 months of treatment. Moreover, all patients followed up for more than 1 year were free of pruritus. The alkaline phosphatase level decreased significantly, and the aminopyrine breath test results increased significantly after 2 weeks of treatment (P less than 0.001) and did not change thereafter. In the 9 patients treated for 15 months, alkaline phosphatase levels decreased to 63% of the basal levels and aminopyrine breath test results increased to 153% of baseline values. Transaminases, gamma-glutamyltransferase, and total bile salt levels decreased significantly after 2 weeks of treatment but returned to baseline after 3 months. No changes in bilirubin and cholesterol levels were observed. It is concluded that long-term rifampicin treatment is effective for relieving pruritus in primary biliary cirrhosis, but liver enzymes should be monitored to detect drug-induced hepatitis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90335-v

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachs, L., Parés, A., Elena, M., Piera, C., & Rodés, J.
Affiliations
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-06
Volume
102
Issue
6
Pages
2077-2080
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1219313770
Cited by
235
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
rifampicin, primary biliary cirrhosis, pruritus, cholestasis, drug-induced hepatitis, aminopyrine breath test, alkaline phosphatase, bile acids, long-term drug therapy, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Bile Acids and Salts, Cholestasis, Female, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Middle Aged, Pruritus, Rifampin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review