Cited by 276Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes

Edwards, Aled M, Kus, Bart, Jansen, Ronald, Greenbaum, Dov, Greenblatt, Jack, Gerstein, Mark·2002·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Currently, there is a major effort to map protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. The utility of the resulting interaction networks will depend on the reliability of the experimental methods and the coverage of the approaches. Known macromolecular complexes provide a defined and objective set of protein interactions with which to compare biochemical and genetic data for validation. Here, we show that a significant fraction of the protein-protein interactions in genome-wide datasets, as well as many of the individual interactions reported in the literature, are inconsistent with the known 3D structures of three recent complexes (RNA polymerase II, Arp2/3 and the proteasome). Furthermore, comparison among genome-wide datasets, and between them and a larger (but less well resolved) group of 174 complexes, also shows marked inconsistencies. Finally, individual interaction datasets, being inherently noisy, are best used when integrated together, and we show how simple Bayesian approaches can combine them, significantly decreasing error rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02763-4

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Y2H, APMS, and other high-throughput experimental approaches have identified many pairs of interacting proteins in yeast and other organisms, but there are discrepancies between sets generated using different methods and considerable false positive and false negative rates.

    “Yeast two hybrid (Y2H), affinity-purification mass spectrometry (APMS), and other high-throughput experimental approaches have identified many pairs of interacting proteins in yeast and other organisms (1–5), but there are discrepancies between sets generated using the different methods and considerable false positive and false negative rates (6–8).”

    From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, A. M., Kus, B., Jansen, R., Greenbaum, D., Greenblatt, J., & Gerstein, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Gerstein, Mark
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
529-536
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134962976
Cited by
276
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50 GM 62413-01, P50GM062413)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, protein-protein interaction network, macromolecular complexes, RNA polymerase II, Arp2/3 complex, proteasome, protein 3D structure, data integration
MeSH terms
Actins, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Multienzyme Complexes, Proteins, RNA Polymerase II, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Genomics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Databases, Protein, Macromolecular Substances, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Actin-Related Protein 3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review