CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing biodiversity conservation priorities: ecosystem risk and representativeness in continental Ecuador

Sierra, Rodrigo, Campos, Felipe, Chamberlin, Jordan·2002·Landscape and Urban Planning
DOI 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00006-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00006-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Cerón, C., Palacios, W., Valencia, R., Sierra, R., 1999. Las Formaciones Naturales de la Costa del Ecuador. In: Sierra, R. (Ed.), Propuesta Preliminar de un Sistema de Clasificación de Vegetación para el Ecuador Continental. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Proyecto INEFAN/GEF-BIRF and EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador, pp. 55–78.
  2. Chapman, F., 1926. The distribution of birdlife in Ecuador: a contribution to a study of the origin of Andean birdlife. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. LV, New York.
  3. De Faria, H., 1993. Elaboración de un Procedimiento para Medir la Efectividad de Manejo de Areas Silvestres Protegidas y su Aplicación en Dos Áreas Protegidas de Costa Rica, thesis. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.
  4. Diels, 1937, Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Vegetation und Flora von Ecuador, Biblioth. Bot., 116, 1
  5. Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Graham, D., Webster, A., Primm, S., Bookbinder M., Ledec, G., 1995. A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank, Washington, DC. · DOI
  6. Faith, 1996, How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas? On hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches, Biodivers. Lett., 3, 18, 10.2307/2999706 · DOI
  7. Flather, 1997, Identifying gaps in conservation networks: of indicators and uncertainty in geographic-based analyses, Ecol. Applic., 7, 531, 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0531:IGICNO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  8. Forero, 1982, La flora y la vegetación del Choco y sus relaciones fitogeográficas, Colombia Geográfica, 10, 77
  9. Ginsberg, 1998, Global conservation priorities, Conserv. Biol., 13, 5, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013001005.x · DOI
  10. Harling, G., 1979. The vegetation types of ecuador: a brief survey. In: Larsen, K., Hom-Nielsen, L. (Eds.), Tropical Botany. Academic Press, London, pp. 165–174.
  11. Hernandez Camacho, J., Hurtado, A., Ortiz, R., Walshburger, T., 1992. Unidades Biogeográficas de Colombia. In: Haffer, G. (Ed.), La Diversidad Biológica de Iberoamérica. Instituto de Ecologı́a, Veracruz, Mexico, pp. 105–151.
  12. Hilty, S.L., Brown, W.L., 1986. A Guide to the Birds of Colombia. Princeton University Press, Chichester, West Sussex.
  13. Hughes, 2000, Conservation of insect diversity: a habitat approach, Conserv. Biol., 14, 1788, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99187.x · DOI
  14. Hummel, M. (Ed.), 1989. Endangered Spaces: The Future of Canada’s Wilderness. Key Porter Books, Ontario, Canada.
  15. Morrison, M., Marcot, B., Mannan, R., 1998. Wildlife–Habitat Relationships: Concepts and Applications. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
  16. Murray, M., Green, M., Bunting, G., Paine, J., 1997. Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation in the Tropics. WCMC Biodiversity Series 6. World Conservation Press, Cambridge, UK.
  17. Myers, 2000, Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature, 403, 853, 10.1038/35002501 · DOI · Paper page
  18. O’Neil, 1995, Using wildlife communities to improve vegetation classification for conserving biodiversity, Conserv. Biol., 9, 1482, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061482.x · DOI
  19. Olson, 1998, The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions, Conserv. Biol., 12, 502, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x · DOI
  20. Palacios, W, Cerón, C., Valencia, R., Sierra, R., 1999. Las Formaciones Naturales de la Amazonı́a del Ecuador. In: Sierra, R. (Ed.), Propuesta Preliminar de un Sistema de Clasificación de Vegetación para el Ecuador Continental. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Proyecto INEFAN/GEF-BIRF and EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador, pp. 109–119.
  21. Pearson, 1998, Global patterns of species richness: spatial models for conservation planning using bioindicator and precipitation data, Conserv. Biol., 12, 809, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96460.x · DOI
  22. Prendergast, 1993, Rare species, the coincidence of biodiversity hotspots and conservation strategies, Nature, 365, 335, 10.1038/365335a0 · DOI
  23. Prendergast, 1999, The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves, Conserv. Biol., 13, 484, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97428.x · DOI
  24. Pressey, 1994, Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal, Biodivers. Conserv., 3, 242, 10.1007/BF00055941 · DOI
  25. Pressey, 1994, The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in western New South Wales, Aust. J. Ecol., 19, 375, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1994.tb00503.x · DOI
  26. Ryti, 1992, Effect of the focal taxon on the selection of nature reserves, Ecol. Applic., 2, 404, 10.2307/1941875 · DOI
  27. Schmidt, 1996, Rare habitat vie for protection, Science, 274, 916, 10.1126/science.274.5289.916 · DOI
  28. Scott, J., Csuti, B., Wright, R., Crist, P., Jennings, M., 1999. Regional approaches to managing and conserving biodiversity. In: Baydack, R., Campa III, H., Haufler, J. (Eds.), Practical Approaches to the Conservation of Biological Diversity. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 55–70.
  29. Stattersfield, A., Crosby, M., Long, A., Wege, D., 1998. Endemic Bird Areas of the World. Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK.
  30. Stoms, 1998, Gap analysis of the vegetation of the intermountain semi-desert ecoregion, The Great Basin Naturalist, 58, 199
  31. Stotz, D., Fitzpatrick, J., Parker III, T., Moskovits, D., 1996. Neotropical Birds. Ecology and Conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  32. Strittholt, 1995, Applying biodiversity gap analysis in a regional nature reserve design for the Edge of Appalachia, Ohio (USA), Conserv. Biol., 9, 1492, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061492.x · DOI
  33. Taggart, 1994, Ordination as an aid in determining priorities for plant community protection, Biol. Conserv., 68, 135, 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90344-1 · DOI
  34. Terborgh, 1983, A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Colombia and Ecuador, Biol. Conserv., 27, 45, 10.1016/0006-3207(83)90005-8 · DOI
  35. Todd, 1998, Assessments of threat and conservation priorities under realistic levels of uncertainty and reliability, Conserv. Biol., 12, 966, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96470.x · DOI
  36. Valencia, R., Cerón, C., Palacios, W., Sierra R., 1999. Las Formaciones Naturales de la Sierra del Ecuador. In: Sierra, R. (Ed.), Propuesta Preliminar de un Sistema de Clasificación de Vegetación para el Ecuador Continental. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Proyecto INEFAN/GEF-BIRF and EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador, pp. 79–108.
  37. Valencia, R., Balslev, H., Palacios, W., Neill, D., Josse, C., Tirado, M., Skov, F., 1998. Diversity and family composition of trees in different regions of Ecuador: a sample of 18 one-hectare plots. In: Dallmier, F., Komiskey, J. (Eds.), Forest Biodiversity in North, Central and South America and the Caribbean: Research and Monitoring. Man and Biosphere Series 21. Parthenon Publishing Group, Paris, pp. 569–584.
  38. Van der Maarel, 1988, Floristic diversity and guild structure in the grasslands of Oland’s Stora Alvar, Acta Phytogeographyca Suecica, 76, 53
  39. Van Schaik, C., Kramer, R., 1997. Toward a new protection paradigm. In: Kremer, R., van Schaik, C., Johnson, J. (Eds.), Last Stand: Protected Areas and the Defense of Tropical Diversity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 212–230. · DOI
  40. World Resources Institute (WRI), 1998. World Resources 1998–1999. Oxford University Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sierra, R., Campos, F., & Chamberlin, J.
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
95-110
ISSN
0169-2046
DOI
10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00006-3
Cited by
122
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review