The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This form of selection bias is likely to be particularly problematic for studies of harmful exposures on disease outcomes that occur in later life and will be least evident in studies where the exposure does not affect survival to recruitment.176”
From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [176]
Citations
Cites
Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data
Bookstein, F. L. (1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511573064 · Cited by 4,481
CANALIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERS
WADDINGTON, C. H. (1942) · Nature · doi:10.1038/150563a0 · Cited by 3,255
Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants
Bradshaw, A. D. (1965) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60048-6 · Cited by 3,207
Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology.
Reyment, R. A., & Bookstein, F. L. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532725 · Cited by 2,790
Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution
Rutherford, S. L., & Lindquist, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24550 · Cited by 2,270
Waddington, C. H. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315765471 · Cited by 2,153
Rohlf, F. J., & Marcus, L. F. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-j · Cited by 2,045
Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-4478 · Cited by 1,832
Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy.
Via, S., Gomulkiewicz, R., de Jong, G., Scheiner, S., Schlichting, C., & van Tienderen, P. V. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89061-8 · Cited by 1,447
Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data.
Bookstein, F. L. (1998) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2534038 · Cited by 1,397
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Zakharov, 1989, Future prospects for population phenogenetics, Sov. Sci. Rev. F. Physiol. Gen. Biol., 4, 1
- Zakharov, 1992, Population phenogenetics: analysis of developmental stability in natural populations, Acta Zool. Fenn., 191, 7
- Thoday, 1953, Components of fitness, Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., 7, 97
- Woltereck, 1909, Weiterer experimentelle Untersuchungen uber Artveranderung, Speziell uber das Wessen Quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden, Versuch. Deutsch Zool. Geselschaft, 19, 110
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davey Smith, G., & Ebrahim, S. (2003) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyg070 · Cited by 5,882
Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology
Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sterne, J. A. C., Timpson, N., & Davey Smith, G. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3034 · Cited by 4,618
“Canalization (also known as developmental compensation) refers to the buffering of the effects of either environmental or genetic forces attempting to perturb development [111–114].”
Sanderson, E., Glymour, M. M., Holmes, M. V., Kang, H., Morrison, J., Munafò, M. R., Palmer, T., Schooling, C. M., Wallace, C., Zhao, Q., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5 · Cited by 2,229
Lande, R. (2009) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01754.x · Cited by 1,101
“The terms ‘genetic canalization’ and ’environmental canalization’ are sometimes applied to describe the reduction in genetic and environmental components of phenotypic variance by stabilizing selection (Stearns et al., 1995; Debat & David, 2001).”
BackgroundGluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., & Beedle, A. S. (2007) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.20590 · Cited by 1,006
“More recent usage of the term canalization, also termed ‘‘auto-regulation’’ by Schmalhausen (1949), has focused on the implied aspect of constraint of phenotypic variation against the effects of genetic or environmental perturbations (Debat and David, 2001).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Debat, V., & David, P.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 555-561
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138673359
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- canalization, phenotypic plasticity, developmental stability, genotype-phenotype correlation, phenotypic variability, phenotypic evolution, natural selection, molecular genetics, developmental genetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
