The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limits to the use of threatened species lists
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species Categories
MACE, G. M., & LANDE, R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00119.x · Cited by 888
Umbrellas and flagships: Efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?
Andelman, S. J., & Fagan, W. F. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.100126797 · Cited by 696
Self-citationMathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks
Possingham, H., Ball, I., & Andelman, S. (2006) · Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology · doi:10.1007/0-387-22648-6_17 · Cited by 693
Self-citationCALCULATING LIMITS TO THE ALLOWABLE HUMAN‐CAUSED MORTALITY OF CETACEANS AND PINNIPEDS
Wade, P. R. (1998) · Marine Mammal Science · doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00688.x · Cited by 606
Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1554 · Cited by 482
Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology
(2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b97704 · Cited by 452
Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much?
Pressey, R. L., Possingham, H. P., & Margules, C. R. (1996) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00120-4 · Cited by 300
Self-citationSetting Conservation Priorities for Landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight Approach
Carter, M. F., Hunter, W. C., Pashley, D. N., & Rosenberg, K. V. (2000) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/auk/117.2.541 · Cited by 226
May, R. M., Lawton, J. H., & Stork, N. E. (1995) · Extinction Rates · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198548294.003.0001 · Cited by 209
Patterns of Behavior in Endangered Species Preservation
Metrick, A., & Weitzman, M. L. (1996) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3147153 · Cited by 208
Cited by
The role of taxonomy in species conservation
Mace, G. M. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1454 · Cited by 955
Developing indicators for European birds
Gregory, R. D., van Strien, A., Vorisek, P., Gmelig Meyling, A. W., Noble, D. G., Foppen, R. P. B., & Gibbons, D. W. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1602 · Cited by 948
Evidence for the Role of Infectious Disease in Species Extinction and Endangerment
SMITH, K. F., SAX, D. F., & LAFFERTY, K. D. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00524.x · Cited by 548
Mooers, A. Ø., Faith, D. P., & Maddison, W. P. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003700 · Cited by 163
Alien plant invasions and native plant extinctions: a six-threshold framework
Downey, P. O., & Richardson, D. M. (2016) · AoB PLANTS · doi:10.1093/aobpla/plw047 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Possingham, H. P., Andelman, S. J., Burgman, M. A., Medellı́n, R. A., Master, L. L., & Keith, D. A.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 503-507
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123802738
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 34.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limits to the use of threatened species lists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02614-9
- The paper
- Possingham, H. P., Andelman, S. J., Burgman, M. A., Medellı́n, R. A., Master, L. L., & Keith, D. A. (2002). Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02614-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
