The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal
Abstract
Using parsimony to reconstruct ancestral character states on a phylogenetic tree has become a popular method for testing ecological and evolutionary hypotheses. Despite its popularity, the assumptions and uncertainties of reconstructing the ancestral states of a single character have received less attention than the much less challenging endeavor of reconstructing phylogenetic trees from many characters. Recent research suggests that parsimony reconstructions are often sensitive to violations of the almost universal assumption of equal probabilities of gains and losses. In addition, maximum likelihood has been developed as an alternative to parsimony reconstruction, and has also revealed a surprising amount of uncertainty in ancestral reconstructions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies
PAGEL, M. (1997) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00423.x · Cited by 1,106
Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Rannala, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5310.227 · Cited by 781
Maddison, W. P. (1990) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05937.x · Cited by 533
CLADISTIC TESTS OF ADAPTATIONAL HYPOTHESES
Coddington, J. A. (1988) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00465.x · Cited by 438
Cited by
Phylogenies and Community Ecology
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · Cited by 4,609
ADAPTIVE VARIATION IN THE VULNERABILITY OF WOODY PLANTS TO XYLEM CAVITATION
Maherali, H., Pockman, W. T., & Jackson, R. B. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0538 · Cited by 746
Tempo and Mode of Evolutionary Radiation in Iguanian Lizards
Harmon, L. J., Schulte, J. A., Larson, A., & Losos, J. B. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1084786 · Cited by 718
Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology
Garland, T., Bennett, A. F., & Rezende, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01745 · Cited by 692
DOES NICHE CONSERVATISM PROMOTE SPECIATION? A CASE STUDY IN NORTH AMERICAN SALAMANDERS
Kozak, K. H., & Wiens, J. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01893.x · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunningham, C. W., Omland, K. E., & Oakley, T. H.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 361-366
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990157150
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01382-2
- The paper
- Cunningham, C. W., Omland, K. E., & Oakley, T. H. (1998). Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01382-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
