Cited by 781Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context

Huelsenbeck, John P., Rannala, Bruce·1997·Science

Abstract

The use of molecular phylogenies to examine evolutionary questions has become commonplace with the automation of DNA sequencing and the availability of efficient computer programs to perform phylogenetic analyses. The application of computer simulation and likelihood ratio tests to evolutionary hypotheses represents a recent methodological development in this field. Likelihood ratio tests have enabled biologists to address many questions in evolutionary biology that have been difficult to resolve in the past, such as whether host-parasite systems are cospeciating and whether models of DNA substitution adequately explain observed sequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.276.5310.227

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Statistical tests for rate changes along a phylogeny have been a part of phylogenetic methodology for several decades and are closely tied to tests for a molecular clock.

    “Statistical tests for rate changes along a phylogeny have been a part of phylogenetic methodology for several decades, and are closely tied to tests for a molecular clock”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Rannala, B.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Huelsenbeck, John P.
Venue
Science
Published
1997-04-11
Volume
276
Issue
5310
Pages
227-232
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2068117230
Cited by
781
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-40282, R01GM040282)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
phylogenetic hypothesis testing, likelihood ratio test, computer simulation, molecular phylogeny, host-parasite coevolution, cospeciation, evolutionary hypothesis testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Computer Simulation, Electron Transport Complex IV, DNA, Biological Evolution, Orthohantavirus, Phthiraptera, Mutation, Phylogeny, RNA, Viral, Rodentia, Likelihood Functions, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review