Cited by 86Groundwater flow and contamination studiesSoil and Unsaturated FlowEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Nonlinear sorption and nonequilibrium solute transport in aggregated porous media: experiments, process identification and modeling

Fesch, Claudia, Simon, Werner, Haderlein, Stefan B, Reichert*, Peter, Schwarzenbach, René P·1998·Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-7722(97)00078-8

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies reported disparities between column and batch methods.

    “However, other investigations have reported disparities between the two methods”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Fesch et al., 1998

  • Prior studies observed good agreement between adsorption isotherms from elution-front integration and batch experiments, and between elution-front integration and multi-C0 column experiments, when equilibrium sorption conditions were ensured.

    “Prior studies have observed good agreement between adsorption isotherms determined from elution-front integration and batch experiments (Burgisser et al., 1993) and from elution-front integration and multi-C0 column experiments (Fesch et al., 1998; Metzelder et al., 2018) when equilibrium sorption conditions were ensured.”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Fesch et al., 1998

  • Fesch et al. (1998) did not observe good agreement between sorption isotherms from elution-front integration and multiple-C0 column experiments when the column experiments employed a pore-water velocity too high for equilibrium conditions.

    “However, Fesch et al. (1998) did not observe good agreement between sorption isotherms determined from elution-front integration and multiple-C0 column experiments when the column experiments employed a pore-water velocity that was too high for equilibrium conditions to be established.”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Fesch et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fesch, C., Simon, W., Haderlein, S. B., Reichert*, P., & Schwarzenbach, R. P.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Corresponding author
Haderlein, Stefan B
Venue
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
31
Issue
3-4
Pages
373-407
ISSN
0169-7722 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145639849
Cited by
86
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Contaminant Hydrology (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
nonlinear sorption, solute transport, clay minerals, organic matter, organic pollutants, breakthrough curves, mine tailings, two-region model, process identification, miscible displacement, rate-limited mass transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review