The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Cited by
Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036170 · Cited by 280
Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties
Cohrs, J. C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2005) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00071.x · Cited by 173
Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028 · Cited by 133
A motivational model of authoritarianism: Integrating personal and situational determinants
Jugert, P., & Duckitt, J. (2009) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00722.x · Cited by 112
Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation
Cohrs, J. C., & Ibler, S. (2009) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530802659638 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1199-1213
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116268942
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00086-1
- The paper
- Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00086-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
