Cited by 112Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

A motivational model of authoritarianism: Integrating personal and situational determinants

Jugert, Philipp, Duckitt, John·2009·Political Psychology

Abstract

We describe and test a collective security model of authoritarianism. This model sees Right Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) as directly caused by collective security motivation (CSM), which is in turn influenced jointly by personality (with its effects mediated through group identification and dangerous world beliefs) and social threat (with its effects mediated through dangerous world beliefs). Two studies tested this model using student samples—one was correlational (N = 218), while the other included an experimental manipulation of threat using future scenarios (N = 136). Structural equation analyses partially supported the model suggesting that CSM fully mediated the effects of threat and group identification on RWA, but only partially mediated the effect of personality, which also had important direct effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00722.x

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jugert, P., & Duckitt, J.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-09
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
693-719
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W2096306216
Cited by
112
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Psychology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
right-wing authoritarianism, social danger, group identification, personality, situational determinants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review