Cited by 110Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation

Cohrs, J. Christopher, Ibler, Sina·2009·Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Right-wing authoritarianism is a central construct in individual differences approaches to prejudice. Its power to predict prejudice is often attributed to perceived threat. However, the exact moderating and mediating processes involved are little understood. In two studies (Ns = 53, 84), exposure to threatening versus nonthreatening information about an ethnic out-group had reliable indirect effects on prejudice in authoritarians, but not in nonauthoritarians, largely because authoritarians were more likely to perceive actual threat when they interpreted the information received to represent a threatening argument. Additionally, in Study 2, authoritarians reacted more strongly with negative emotions when they perceived actual threat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01973530802659638

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohrs, J. C., & Ibler, S.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • b Nuremberg, Germany
Corresponding author
Cohrs, J. Christopher
Venue
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
Published
2009-02-19
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
81-94
ISSN
  • 0197-3533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4834
OpenAlex
W1977978563
Cited by
110
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Basic and Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
right-wing authoritarianism, prejudice, threat perception, mediation, moderation, individual differences, negative emotions, intergroup attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review