Cited by 21Menstrual Health and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolCognitive Abilities and Testing

Trait anxiety, stress and the menstrual cycle: Effects on Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices test

Kumari, Veena, Corr, Philip J.·1998·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00233-x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumari, V., & Corr, P. J.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Corr, Philip J.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
615-623
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119452174
Cited by
21
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
trait anxiety, stress, menstrual cycle, premenstrual phase, menstruation, Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, intelligence test performance, cognitive performance, time pressure, arousal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review