Cited by 18Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

A comparative study of general intelligence in Spanish and Moroccan samples

Díaz, Amelia, Sellami, Khadija, Infanzón, Eugenia, Lanzón, Teresa, Lynn, Richard·2012·The Spanish journal of psychology

Abstract

The aim of this study is to fill a gap in intelligence research by presenting data for the average IQ in Morocco and for a comparable sample in Spain. Adult samples were administered the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) (Raven, Court, & Raven, 2001) and scored for the total test and for the three sub-factors of gestalt continuation, verbal-analytical reasoning and visuospatial ability identified by Lynn, Allik, and Irwing (2004). The total test and the three factors have shown satisfactory reliability. Our results for the Moroccan sample show significant relationship between general intelligence factor, gestalt continuation and visuospatial ability with education level and income. Conversely, these variables have been shown to be independent for the Spanish sample. This sample obtained significantly higher scores for the four factors assessed than the Moroccan one. These differences have been found also comparing samples with the same education levels. Finally, the errors percentage for Moroccans has been higher than for Spaniards in all the items, suggesting that the level of difficulty was higher for the Moroccan sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n2.38863

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A White Spanish sample compared with a sample of Moroccans did not report a clear confirmation of Spearman's hypothesis.

    “More recently, a White Spanish sample was compared with a sample of Moroccans but did not report a clear confirmation of Spearman's hypothesis [16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Díaz, A., Sellami, K., Infanzón, E., Lanzón, T., & Lynn, R.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Díaz, Amelia
Venue
The Spanish journal of psychology
Published
2012-07
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
526-532
ISSN
  • 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1988-2904
OpenAlex
W2141444734
Cited by
18
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
general intelligence, Raven Standard Progressive Matrices, visuospatial ability, cross-cultural comparison, Moroccan adults, Spanish adults, educational attainment, income, test difficulty, IQ
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Morocco, Socioeconomic Factors, Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review