Cited by 64Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disorders

Randomized clinical trial of melatonin after night-shift work: Efficacy and neuropsychologic effects

Wright, Seth W, Lawrence, Laurie M, Wrenn, Keith D, Haynes, Mary Lou, Welch, Larry W, Schlack, Heide M·1998·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective Melatonin has received considerable publicity for its sleep-promoting properties; however, there is little scientific evidence of its efficacy. The objective of this study is to determine whether there are measurable beneficial effects from exogenous melatonin in emergency physicians after intermittent night-shift duty.Methods This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial was conducted in the emergency department of an urban tertiary care hospital. Fifteen emergency physicians were given melatonin 5 mg or placebo for 3 consecutive nights after night-shift duty with crossover to the opposite agent after a subsequent block of night shifts. The primary outcome measure was the global assessment of recovery measured by a visual analog scale. Secondary outcome measures included sleep quality, duration, and tiredness. In addition, the Profile of Mood States questionnaire and neuropsychologic testing were performed.Results There was no difference between melatonin and placebo in the global assessment of recovery (60.4+/-16.9 and 58.9+/-14.5, respectively; P=.29). There were no differences in sleep quality, duration or tiredness scores, sleep latency, hours of sleep obtained per night, and night or early awakening at any measurement point. Profile of Mood States and neuropsychologic test performances were similar.Conclusion We found no beneficial effect of melatonin on sleep quality, tiredness, or cognitive function in emergency physicians after night-shift duty. Our results suggest that exogenous melatonin is of limited value in recovery from night-shift work in emergency physicians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70010-1

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, S. W., Lawrence, L. M., Wrenn, K. D., Haynes, M. L., Welch, L. W., & Schlack, H. M.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
334-340
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157247181
Cited by
64
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
melatonin, night shift work, emergency physicians, sleep quality, fatigue, sleep duration, cognitive function, mood, exogenous melatonin
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Antioxidants, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Emergency Medicine, Female, Humans, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Neuropsychology, Night Care, Placebos, Prospective Studies, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Time Factors, Free Radical Scavengers, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review