Negative and positive party identification in post-Communist countries
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Negative partisanship is particularly important for understanding political attitudes in Eastern Europe and several Latin American countries, contexts in which positive identification with parties is low and political competition is often dichotomized.
“Negative partisanship is particularly important for understanding political attitudes in Eastern Europe (Rose and Mishler 1998) and several Latin American countries (Haime and Cantú 2022), contexts in which positive identification with parties is low and political competition is often dichotomized.”
From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Rose and Mishler 1998
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century
Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems
Wagner, M. (2021) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Mass Partisan Polarization: Measuring a Relational Concept
Lauka, A., McCoy, J., & Firat, R. B. (2018) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764218759581 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Polarisation, identity and affect - conceptualising affective polarisation in multi-party systems
Röllicke, L. (2023) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102655 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil
Areal, J. (2022) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2022.2117635 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cuarenta años de polarización ideológica en España
Rodriguez-Virgili, J., Portilla-Manjón, I., & Sierra-Iso, A. (2022) · Revista Empresa y Humanismo · doi:10.15581/015.xxv.2.75-103 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rose, R., & Mishler, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rose, Richard
- ORCID
- Rose, Richard
- Venue
- Electoral Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-234
- ISSN
- 0261-3794 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975582252
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 52.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electoral Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Oesterreichische Nationalbank
- Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- negative partisanship, post-communist states, one-party state, political socialization, ideological polarization, religious parties, ethnic minority parties, Central and Eastern Europe, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
