The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: a survey
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk analysis and management in construction
Akintoye, A. S., & MacLeod, M. J. (1997) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(96)00035-x · Cited by 755
Use and benefits of tools for project risk management
Raz, T., & Michael, E. (2001) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00036-8 · Cited by 402
Questionnaire Survey on Bidding in Construction
Ahmad, I., & Minkarah, I. (1988) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)9742-597x(1988)4:3(229 · Cited by 221
Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project
Uher, T. E., & Toakley, A. R. (1999) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00024-6 · Cited by 175
Managing project risks: a case study from the utilities sector
Elkington, P., & Smallman, C. (2002) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(00)00034-x · Cited by 132
Risk response techniques employed currently for major projects
Baker, S., Ponniah, D. A., & Smith, S. D. (1999) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461999371709 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment
Zeng, J., An, M., & Smith, N. J. (2007) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.006 · Cited by 537
Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review
Taroun, A. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004 · Cited by 387
Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study
Chien, K.-F., Wu, Z.-H., & Huang, S.-C. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.012 · Cited by 317
Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management
Kardes, I., Ozturk, A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Cavusgil, E. (2013) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.003 · Cited by 278
Islam, M. S., Nepal, M. P., Skitmore, M., & Attarzadeh, M. (2017) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001 · Cited by 163
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyons, T., & Skitmore, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Project Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-61
- ISSN
- 0263-7863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1608457058
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: a survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0263-7863(03)00005-x
- The paper
- Lyons, T., & Skitmore, M. (2004). Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: a survey. International Journal of Project Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-7863(03)00005-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
