The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance
Abstract
Porter [Porter, M.E., 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review 74 (6), 61–78.] claims that a proper link between strategy and manufacturing operations is a key to developing sustainable competitive advantage. To be successful in this globally competitive, rapidly changing environment, organizations must formulate strategic plans that are consistent with their investment in and use of manufacturing technology. This study proposes that organizations that invest in advanced manufacturing technology and develop mechanisms for manufacturing managers to participate in strategy formulation will have improved competitive capabilities and better performance than firms that do not. Using the result from a large‐sample survey, this study develops valid and reliable measures of advanced manufacturing technology and manufacturing managers' participation in strategy formulation as well as the competitive capabilities of a firm. Linear structural equation analysis (LISREL) results show that the relationships between a firm's practices in these two areas and its competitive capabilities are found to be statistically significant and positive. Also, high levels of these competitive capabilities lead to high levels of performance as measured by customer satisfaction and marketing performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
On the Meaning of within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208993 · Cited by 526
Cited by
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Childe, S. J. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2018-0119 · Cited by 480
How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility?
Lee, O.-K. (., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0577 · Cited by 447
Walter, A.-T. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00186-6 · Cited by 331
Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: The role of sustainability
Niaki, M. K., Torabi, S. A., & Nonino, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.019 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Tracey, M., Vonderembse, M. A., & Lim, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 411-428
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2064077433
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00045-x
- The paper
- Tracey, M., Vonderembse, M. A., & Lim, J. (1999). Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00045-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.