Cited by 341Family Caregiving in Mental IllnessCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Attributions and expressed emotion: A review

Barrowclough, Christine, Hooley, Jill M·2003·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

This review examines the contribution of an attribution-based framework to our understanding of both expressed emotion (EE) and the process of patient relapse. It considers all published studies that have assessed the attributions of high- and low-EE relatives and carers. Across these studies, a great deal of consistency is apparent. Critical relatives are more likely to hold patients responsible for their difficulties. On the other hand, attributions made by emotionally overinvolved relatives are similar to the attributions made by those who are low EE. In reviewing the association between attributions and patient relapse, it is concluded that carers' beliefs may play a role in the relapse process in a variety of ways. These include mediating controlling behavior, which may serve to increase patient stress or decrease patients' sense of self-worth. A major limitation of research in this area is the cross-sectional and correlational nature of the data. This makes it impossible to draw conclusions about directions of effect in the association of EE and attributions. Nonetheless, an argument can be made for the development and evaluation of interventions designed to help relatives adopt less blaming and more flexible beliefs about the nature of patients' problems. Particularly helpful in this regard may be interventions that use verbal and behavioral reattribution techniques similar to those described in the cognitive behavioral treatment of emotional disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-7358(03)00075-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In critical or hostile relationships, carers believe the service user needs to get better and to control problems.

    “Service user needs to get better and to control problems”

    From Cognitive model of caregiving in psychosis (2010) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrowclough, C., & Hooley, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Barrowclough, Christine
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
849-880
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127186825
Cited by
341
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
expressed emotion, attribution, relatives, caregivers, blame, emotional overinvolvement, controlling behavior, family intervention, reattribution
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Family, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Recurrence, Caregivers, Expressed Emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review