The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation
Abstract
Evidence-based decision-making is centred on the justification of decisions. In the shift from an individual-clinical to a population-policy level, the decision-making context becomes more uncertain, variable and complex. To address this we have developed a conceptual framework for evidence-based decision-making, focusing on how context impacts on what constitutes evidence and how that evidence is utilised. We present two distinct orientations towards what constitutes evidence, representing different relationships between evidence and context. We also categorise the decision-making context based on the ways in which context impacts on evidence-based decision-making. Furthermore, we invoke the concept of axes of evidence-based decision-making to describe the relationship between evidence and context as we move from evidence-based medicine to evidence-based health policy. From this, we suggest that it may be more important how evidence is utilised than how it is defined. Based on the research and knowledge utilisation literature, we present a process model of evidence utilisation, which forms the basis for the conceptual framework for context-based evidence-based decision-making. The conceptual framework attempts to capture the role that context plays in the introduction, interpretation and application of evidence. We illustrate this framework with examples from policy development for colorectal cancer screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine
Guyatt, G. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032 · Cited by 4,202
Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis
Holsti, O. R., & Allison, G. T. (1972) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/446741 · Cited by 3,658
The challenge of complexity in health care
Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 · Cited by 2,578
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
Weiss, C. H. (1979) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/3109916 · Cited by 2,222
Guide to Clinical Preventive Services
Wesley Allen, T. (1991) · The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association · doi:10.1515/jom-1991-900515 · Cited by 2,129
Handbook of Organization Studies
Hubbell, L., Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (1997) · Public Productivity & Management Review · doi:10.2307/3380686 · Cited by 1,983
Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services
(1973) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/s0033-3506(73)80082-4 · Cited by 1,912
Handbook of Organization Studies
Wood, S., Clegg, S., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (1997) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591759 · Cited by 1,294
The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings
Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392533 · Cited by 683
Cited by
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190
The Use of Research Evidence in Public Health Decision Making Processes: Systematic Review
Orton, L., Lloyd-Williams, F., Taylor-Robinson, D., O'Flaherty, M., & Capewell, S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021704 · Cited by 599
The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare
Pearson, A., Wiechula, R., Court, A., & Lockwood, C. (2005) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00026.x · Cited by 451
Milat, A. J., King, L., Bauman, A. E., & Redman, S. (2013) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dar097 · Cited by 437
Educating Managers From an Evidence-Based Perspective.
Rousseau, D. M., & McCarthy, S. (2007) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2007.24401705 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobrow, M. J., Goel, V., & Upshur, R. E. G.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 207-217
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976823095
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 31.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00166-7
- The paper
- Dobrow, M. J., Goel, V., & Upshur, R. E. G. (2004). Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00166-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.