The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Merton, R. K. (2017) · Gangs · doi:10.4324/9781351157803-1 · Cited by 3,694
Cited by
Abrahamson, E. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258636 · Cited by 1,828
Aken, J. E. V. (2004) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x · Cited by 1,303
Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance1
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. V. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249403 · Cited by 1,120
Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes
Moorman, C. (1995) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379503200307 · Cited by 1,020
Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review
Innvær, S., Vist, G., Trommald, M., & Oxman, A. (2002) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581902320432778 · Cited by 1,006
Metadata
- Authors
- Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 591
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004519377
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2392533
- The paper
- Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1982). The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
