CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 274Sex and Gender in HealthcareGender, Health, and Social InequalityHealth and Medical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do women over-report morbidity? Men’s and women’s responses to structured prompting on a standard question on long standing illness

Macintyre, Sally, Ford, Graeme, Hunt, Kate·1999·Social Science & Medicine
DOI 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00292-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It is frequently observed in contemporary industrialised societies that although women live longer than men, they are sicker than men in that they report higher rates of morbidity, disability and health care use. One common element of the explanation for women's higher rates of morbidity is that there are gender differences in the way that symptoms are perceived, evaluated and acted upon. It is widely assumed that women will be more ready to report illness and to seek help and that they have greater flexibility in their lives to accommodate illness. The few studies that have examined men and women with the same conditions or symptoms are contradictory, but lend little support to this hypothesised greater propensity, yet it is still widely believed. Here we compare men's and women's answers to a global, commonly used question about chronic illness and to a series of more specific prompts and classify the conditions reported by an externally defined categorisation of severity and International Classification of Disease chapter. Contrary to the common expectation that women report higher rates of morbidity and are more ready to report mental health problems, we found: no gender differences in the initial reporting of conditions; men reported a higher proportion of their conditions in response to the initial global question; and no evidence that women were more likely to report 'trivial' or mental health conditions in response to the initial question.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00292-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Macintyre, S., Ford, G., & Hunt, K.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Macintyre, Sally
ORCID
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
89-98
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00292-5
OpenAlex
W2033999653
Cited by
273
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
women's health, chronic disease, structured prompting, mental illness, International Classification of Diseases, health status measurement, sex differences in health
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cues, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Scotland, Sex Factors, Sick Role, Cohort Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Women's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review