The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137
(1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665868 · Cited by 4,133
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8 · Cited by 2,333
Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Weston, W. W., McWhinney, I. R., McWilliam, C. L., & Freeman, T. R. (1995) · Cited by 1,299
Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method
Schofield, T. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7019.1580 · Cited by 866
Patient participation in decision-making
Guadagnoli, E., & Ward, P. (1998) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00059-8 · Cited by 796
Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research
Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973299129121677 · Cited by 773
Self-citationThe Consultation: An Approach to Learning and Teaching.
(1984) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-101-4-577_2 · Cited by 585
Cockburn, J., & Pit, S. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7107.520 · Cited by 523
Partnerships with Patients: The Pros and Cons of Shared Clinical Decision-Making
Coulter, A. (1997) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581969700200209 · Cited by 487
Cited by
An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters
Makoul, G., & Clayman, M. L. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010 · Cited by 1,621
Shared Decision Making and Medication Management in the Recovery Process
Deegan, P. E., & Drake, R. E. (2006) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.11.1636 · Cited by 490
Barry, C. A., Stevenson, F. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., & Bradley, C. P. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00351-8 · Cited by 464
Self-citationMalpass, A., Shaw, A., Sharp, D., Walter, F., Feder, G., Ridd, M., & Kessler, D. (2009) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.068 · Cited by 368
Changing face of medical curricula
Jones, R., Higgs, R., de Angelis, C., & Prideaux, D. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04134-9 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevenson, F. A., Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., & Bradley, C. P.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 829-840
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086263287
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 46.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00376-7
- The paper
- Stevenson, F. A., Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., & Bradley, C. P. (2000). Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00376-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
