The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are Phragmites-dominated wetlands a net source or net sink of greenhouse gases?
Abstract
Phragmites australis wetlands act as a sink for greenhouse gases by photosynthetic assimilation of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere and sequestration of the organic matter produced in the wetland soil. The wetlands also act as a source for greenhouse gases by emission of sediment-produced methane (CH4) to the atmosphere. In P. australis wetlands, the dominant mechanism of CH4 release to the atmosphere is internal gas transport in the plants, primarily by pressurized convective gas flow. The time periods of carbon fixation and CH 4 release therefore vary seasonally and diurnally. The balance between net CO2-assimilation and CH4 emission determines if a wetland can be regarded as a net sink or a net source of greenhouse gases, and hence, the function of the wetland in relation to global climate change. On an annual basis up to 15% of the net carbon fixed by the wetlands may be released to the atmosphere as CH 4. Because of the different infrared absorption characteristics and atmospheric longevity of CH4 and CO2, the warming effect of CH4 in the atmosphere is about 21 times higher on a mass basis than CO2 over a 100-year timescale. Thus, the immediate carbon balance, coupled with the different physical characteristics of the two gases, would suggest that although some wetlands function as a net sink for CO2, the wetlands still increase the greenhouse effect because of their release of CH4. However, the short adjustment time for CH4 in the atmosphere means that, over a longer time scale, the radiative forcing of CH4 is less relative to CO2 and the wetlands effectively become a sink for greenhouse gases. Wetlands may therefore be regarded as a source for greenhouse gases and so increase radiative forcing if evaluated on a short time scale (decades), but as a sink for greenhouse gases and thus attenuating radiative forcing if evaluated over longer time scales (>100 years). © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Vymazal, J. (2010) · Water · doi:10.3390/w2030530 · Cited by 1,208
Weis, J. S., & Weis, P. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.002 · Cited by 959
Carbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review
Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A., & Hedmark, Å. (2010) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/s13157-009-0003-4 · Cited by 690
The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems
Lal, R., Smith, P., Jungkunst, H. F., Mitsch, W. J., Lehmann, J., Nair, P. K. R., McBratney, A. B., de Moraes Sá, J. C., Schneider, J., Zinn, Y. L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.73.6.145a · Cited by 394
Balancing carbon sequestration and GHG emissions in a constructed wetland
de Klein, J. J. M., & van der Werf, A. K. (2014) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.060 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Brix, H., Sorrell, B. K., & Lorenzen, B.
- Venue
- Aquatic Botany
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2-4
- Pages
- 313-324
- ISSN
- 0304-3770 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163471825
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Phragmites-dominated wetlands a net source or net sink of greenhouse gases? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3770(01)00145-0
- The paper
- Brix, H., Sorrell, B. K., & Lorenzen, B. (2001). Are Phragmites-dominated wetlands a net source or net sink of greenhouse gases? Aquatic Botany. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3770(01)00145-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.