The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles
Open accessAbstract
Morocco, we explore several explanations for the small employment and output response to large changes in tariffs and quotas.Finally, Section III discusses the relationship between rising wage inequality and trade reform in Mexico. I. Trade Policies and Long Run GrowthThe Relationship between Trade and Growth Static trade models suggest that movements towards openness can temporarily increase the rate of growth due to short-run gains from the reallocation of resources, which would imply a positive relationship between changes in openness and GDP growth.The new growth literature also identifies a number of avenues through which openness might affect long run growth.Edwards (1998), for example, shows that technological change is a positive function of both a country's openness and the gap between a country's technology level and the rest of the world.Intuitively, countries which are more backward and provide more opportunities to absorb new ideas will converge faster to international norms.Coe and Helpman (1995) discuss how recent models of economic growth imply a positive relationship between openness to trade and total factor productivity growth, or TFP.Drawing on Grossman and Helpman (1991), they argue that differences in TFP can be explained by either an expanding number of inputs or higher input quality.To the extent that countries which are open to trade can either learn more quickly how to produce these new inputs, or can import them, openness will be positively related to TFP.Grossman and Helpman (1991), however, show that in a theoretical framework, the relationship between opening up to trade and long run growth is in fact ambiguous.Whether or
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration
Sachs, J. D., Warner, A., Aslund, A., & Fischer, S. (1995) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534573 · Cited by 4,950
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118467 · Cited by 1,870
Cited by
Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence
Rodríguez, F., & Rodrik, D. (2000) · NBER Macroeconomics Annual · doi:10.1086/654419 · Cited by 2,355
Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far
Winters, L. A., McCulloch, N., & McKay, A. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205104773558056 · Cited by 1,085
The Long and Short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement
Trefler, D. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828042002633 · Cited by 1,071
Factor Immobility and Regional Impacts of Trade Liberalization: Evidence on Poverty from India
Topalova, P. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.2.4.1 · Cited by 658
Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries*
Harrison, A., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2010) · Handbook of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52944-2.00001-x · Cited by 595
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, A., & Hanson, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Development Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-154
- ISSN
- 0304-3878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062561513
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 51.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3878(99)00008-5
- The paper
- Harrison, A., & Hanson, G. (1999). Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles. Journal of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3878(99)00008-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.