Cited by 1,870Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityGlobal trade and economicsEconomic Growth and Productivity

Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U. S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures

Berman, E., Bound, J., Griliches, Z.·1994·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

This paper investigates the shift in demand away from unskilled and toward skilled labor in U. S. manufacturing over the 1980s. Production labor-saving technological change is the chief explanation for this shift. That conclusion is based on three facts: (1) the shift is due mostly to increased use of skilled workers within the 450 industries in U. S. manufacturing rather than to a reallocation of employment between industries, as would be implied by a shift in product demand due to trade or to a defense buildup; (2) trade- and defense-demand are associated with only small employment reallocation effects; (3) increased use of nonproduction workers is strongly correlated with investment in computers and in R&D.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2118467

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Income distribution becomes dependent on changes in the skill composition of workers and the skill-biased nature of technological progress.

    “Therefore, the income distribution becomes dependent on the changes in the skill composition of workers and skill-biased nature of technological progress (see, for instance, Berman et al., 1994;Autor et al., 1998;Piva and Vivarelli, 2004;Acemoglu and Autor, 2011).”

    From Financialization and the Labor Share of Income (2019) · cites this paper as Berman et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1994-05-01
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
367-397
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2078001550
Cited by
1,870
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 55
FWCI
93.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
skilled labor demand, manufacturing employment, labor reallocation, defense spending, IT investment, R&D investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review