Cited by 44Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Cell cycle kinesis in lymphocytes in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

Nagy, Zsuzsanna, Combrinck, Marc, Budge, Marc, McShane, Rupert·2002·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The currently available clinical diagnostic tools do not allow an accurate and reliable diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in other than demented patients. Furthermore, they do not allow the identification of subjects with pre-clinical AD. Cell cycle regulatory failure in neurones appears to be a very early event in the pathogenesis of AD. Our earlier findings indicate that there is a specific failure of the G1/S transition checkpoint that may not be restricted to neurones alone. We tested the possibility that lymphocytes of AD sufferers may also show signs of G1 regulatory failure. We found that the in vitro responsiveness of lymphocytes to G1 inhibitor treatment was significantly less effective in AD patients than in control subjects. Additionally, in subjects showing neuropsychological signs of pre-clinical AD, the lymphocyte response was similar to that seen in AD patients. We present direct evidence to support the hypothesis that the failure of the G1/S transition control is not restricted to neurones in AD patients, but occurs in peripheral cells, such as lymphocytes, as well. Our findings could provide the basis for new clinical tests that rely on eliciting the activation of the G1/S transition checkpoint in lymphocyte cultures. We propose that the introduction of the test could be useful in identifying people who do not yet fulfil the requirements of the NINCDS criteria for dementia, but who would benefit from the use of preventive measures for AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02442-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagy, Z., Combrinck, M., Budge, M., & McShane, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Churchill Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Nagy, Zsuzsanna
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
317
Issue
2
Pages
81-84
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089284381
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, lymphocytes, peripheral biomarkers, Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, preventive measures
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cells, Cultured, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Doxorubicin, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Lymphocyte Activation, Lymphocytes, Neurons, Neuropsychological Tests, Organ Specificity, Phytohemagglutinins, G1 Phase, Oxidative Stress, Risk Assessment, Cell Cycle Proteins, Sirolimus, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review