Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence that postoperative pain is a mediator of the tumor-promoting effects of surgery in rats

Page, Gayle Giboney, Blakely, Wendy P., Ben-Eliyahu, Shamgar·2001·Pain

Abstract

We have previously shown in rats that the provision of analgesic doses of morphine significantly reduces the tumor-promoting effects of undergoing and recovering from surgery. Because morphine had no effect in non-operated animals, and because a single preoperative dose given hours before tumor inoculation was effective, we have suggested that it is the pain-relieving effects of the drug that underlies its beneficial impact. To support and strengthen this suggestion, two different regimens of analgesia were employed, the systemic administration of the more selective mu-agonist, fentanyl, and the intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bupivacaine plus morphine. To assess host resistance against metastasis, we used a lung clearance assay of the MADB106 mammary adenocarcinoma, a natural killer (NK)-sensitive syngeneic cell line that metastasizes only to the lungs. Female and male Fischer 344 rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups using a 2x2 experimental design: experimental laparotomy under halothane anesthesia versus anesthesia alone, by drug treatment versus vehicle. In the first in vivo experiment, fentanyl was administered 20 min before surgery (40 microg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.)), and at the end of surgery in a slow-release suspension (20 microg/kg s.c.). In the second in vivo experiment, bupivacaine (10 microg) plus morphine (20 microg) in 50 microl was administered i.t. before surgery. Surgery resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in the lung retention of MADB106 cells in both males and females, and the observed surgery-induced increase in lung tumor retention was reduced by more than 65% in the fentanyl-treated animals and more than 45% in the animals receiving i.t. bupivacaine plus morphine. Neither drug regimen exerted effects in the anesthesia only animals. Surgery also resulted in a significant suppression of whole blood NK activity assessed at 5 h postoperatively, the same time point at which MADB106 tumor cells were inoculated in the in vivo studies. Unlike the in vivo study, fentanyl suppressed NK activity at this time point in non-operated rats, but had no effect in operated rats. Taken together, these findings strengthen the suggestion that the management of perioperative pain is a critical factor in preventing surgery-induced decreases in host resistance against metastasis. If similar relationships between pain and metastasis occur in humans, then pain control must become a priority in the postoperative care of individuals with cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00403-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Page, G. G., Blakely, W. P., & Ben-Eliyahu, S.
Venue
Pain
Published
2001-02
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
191-199
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018484477
Cited by
297
References
0
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence that postoperative pain is a mediator of the tumor-promoting effects of surgery in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00403-6
The paper
Page, G. G., Blakely, W. P., & Ben-Eliyahu, S. (2001). Evidence that postoperative pain is a mediator of the tumor-promoting effects of surgery in rats. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00403-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.