The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations
Abstract
This study examined the factor structure of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in three different Dutch-speaking samples: 550 pain-free students, 162 chronic low back pain patients, and 100 fibromyalgia patients. Confirmatory factor analyses were used to compare three different models of pain catastrophizing (one factor, two oblique factors, three oblique factors), and to investigate the invariance of the factor structure across the three different samples. The results indicated that a three-factor oblique model with a four-item rumination factor, a three-item magnification factor, and a six-item helplessness factor provided the best fit to the data in the three samples. Furthermore, it was found that this model could be considered as invariant across three samples (pain-free students, chronic low back pain patients, and fibromyalgia patients) and across gender, indicating that the same processes are measured in different subgroups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A sample size of 70 participants per group was needed to detect a moderate effect size in the primary outcome variable with a 2-sided 5% significance level and 80% power.”
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
The american college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia
Wolfe, F., Smythe, H. A., Yunus, M. B., Bennett, R. M., Bombardier, C., Goldenberg, D. L., Tugwell, P., Campbell, S. M., Abeles, M., Clark, P., et al. (1990) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780330203 · Cited by 9,563
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Clogg, C. C., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580595 · Cited by 8,246
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 · Cited by 4,105
Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · Cited by 3,953
Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain
Sullivan, M. J. L., Thorn, B., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Keefe, F., Martin, M., Bradley, L. A., & Lefebvre, J. C. (2001) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008 · Cited by 2,472
Rosenstiel, A. K., & Keefe, F. J. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2 · Cited by 2,314
Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2,044
Pain demands attention: A cognitive–affective model of the interruptive function of pain.
Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356 · Cited by 1,718
Self-citationCrombez, G., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & Lysens, R. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00229-2 · Cited by 1,675
Self-citationUtility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research.
Cole, D. A. (1987) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.55.4.584 · Cited by 1,089
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples
Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Gutierrez, P. M., Kopper, B. A., Merrifield, T., & Grittmann, L. (2000) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1005548801037 · Cited by 944
Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Kopper, B. A., Hauptmann, W., Jones, J., & O'Neill, E. (1997) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1025570508954 · Cited by 881
Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble
Burton, A. K., Tillotson, K. M., Main, C. J., & Hollis, S. (1995) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014 · Cited by 700 · cited 3×
“Another prospective study, investigating predictors of back pain chronicity 1 year after the acute onset, revealed catastrophizing as the most powerful predictor (Burton et al., 1995). Catastrophic thinking about pain has been conceptualized in different ways. First, based upon interview responses from dental patients…”
InfluentialCatastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries
Sullivan, M. J. L., Stanish, W., Waite, H., Sullivan, M., & Tripp, D. A. (1998) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00097-9 · Cited by 593
When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference
Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., Baeyens, F., & Eelen, P. (1998) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00219-4 · Cited by 379
Self-citationInteractive LISREL: User's Guide
du Toit, M., Toit, S. D., & Hawkins, D. M. (2001) · Cited by 365
Catastrophizing, depression and expectancies for pain and emotional distress
Sullivan, M. J. L., Rodgers, W. M., & Kirsch, I. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00430-9 · Cited by 316
Gender Differences in Pain and Pain Behavior: The Role of Catastrophizing
Sullivan, M. J. L., Tripp, D. A., & Santor, D. (2000) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1005459110063 · Cited by 285
Spaños, N. P., Radtke-Bodorik, H. L., Ferguson, J. D., & Jones, B. (1979) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.88.3.282 · Cited by 254
Spanos, N. P., Radtke-Bodorik, H. L., Ferguson, J. D., & Jones, B. (1979) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.88.3.282 · Cited by 250
Are fear-avoidance beliefs related to the inception of an episode of back pain? A prospective study
Linton, S. J., Buer, N., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Hellsing, A.-L. (2000) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440008407366 · Cited by 207
Spontaneous cognitive strategies for the control of clinical pain and stress
Chaves, J. F., & Brown, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf00846540 · Cited by 187
Thought Suppression, Catastrophizing, and Pain
Sullivan, M., Rouse, D. L., Bishop, S. R., & Johnston, S. (1997) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021809519002 · Cited by 136
Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Dutch language version (MPI-DLV)
Lousberg, R. L., van Breukelen, G., Groenman, N. H., Schmidt, A. J. M., Arntz, A. R., & Winter, F. A. M. (1999) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00137-5 · Cited by 132
Panic disorder and hypochondriasis
Salkovskis, P. M., & Clark, D. M. (1993) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(93)90002-j · Cited by 131
Catastrophizing and pain perception in sport participants
Sullivan, M. J. L., Tripp, D. A., Rodgers, W. M., & Stanish, W. D. (2000) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200008404220 · Cited by 118
Individual differences and the effectiveness of different coping strategies for pain
Heyneman, N. E., Fremouw, W. J., Gano, D., Kirkland, F., & Heiden, L. (1990) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173525 · Cited by 116
Goubert, L., Francken, G., Crombez, G., Vansteenwegen, D., & Lysens, R. (2002) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00020-1 · Cited by 96 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, catastrophizing has been associated with overprediction of pain, increased pain behavior, increased use of health care services, longer hospital stays, and increased use of medication (Goubert et al., 2001; Sullivan et al., 2001b).”
Self-citationSullivan, M. J. L., & Neish, N. R. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00163-8 · Cited by 91
De Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Psychometrische karakteristieken en normering
Damme, S. V., Crombez, G., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Goubert, L., den Broeck, A. V., & Houdenhove, B. V. (2000) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 67
Self-citation(1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blanpied, P. R., Gross, A. R., Elliott, J. M., Devaney, L. L., Clewley, D., Walton, D. M., Sparks, C., & Robertson, E. K. (2017) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0302 · Cited by 979
The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation
Crombez, G., Bijttebier, P., Eccleston, C., Mascagni, T., Mertens, G., Goubert, L., & Verstraeten, K. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00121-0 · Cited by 652
Self-citationDelitto, A., George, S. Z., Dillen, L. V., Whitman, J. M., Sowa, G., Shekelle, P., Denninger, T. R., & Godges, J. J. (2012) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.42.4.a1 · Cited by 1,219
The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?
Thong, I. S. K., Jensen, M. P., Miró, J., & Tan, G. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012 · Cited by 652
Catastrophizing and pain in arthritis, fibromyalgia, and other rheumatic diseases
Edwards, R. R., Bingham, C. O., Bathon, J. M., & Haythornthwaite, J. A. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.21865 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Bijttebier, P., Goubert, L., & Van Houdenhove, B.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-324
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020682201
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- Pain Catastrophizing Scale, pain catastrophizing, factor structure, measurement invariance, rumination, magnification, helplessness, chronic low back pain, fibromyalgia, cross-cultural validation, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Sex Factors, Low Back Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
