The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient-related barriers to pain management: the barriers questionnaire II (BQ-II)
Abstract
Patients' beliefs can act as barriers to optimal management of cancer pain. The Barriers Questionnaire (BQ) is a tool used to evaluate such barriers. Here, the BQ has been revised to reflect changes in pain management practices, resulting in the Barriers Questionnaire-II (BQ-II), a 27-item, self report instrument. This paper presents the results from two studies where the psychometric properties of the BQ-II were evaluated. In the first study, the responses of 27 nurses trained in pain management were compared to responses of a convenience sample of 12 patients with cancer. The results indicated that patients with cancer had higher mean scores on the BQ-II than did nurses trained in pain management. In the second study, a convenience sample of 172 patients with cancer responded to the BQ-II and a set of pain and quality of life (QOL) measures. A factor analysis supported four factors. Factor one, physiological effects, consists of 12 items addressing the beliefs that side effects of analgesics are inevitable and unmanageable, concerns about tolerance, and concerns about not being able to monitor changes in one's body when taking strong pain medications. Factor two, Fatalism, consists of three items addressing fatalistic beliefs about cancer pain and its management. Factor three, Communication, consists of six items addressing the concern that reports of pain distract the physician from treating the underlying disease, and the belief that 'good' patients do not complain of pain. The fourth and final factor, harmful effects, consists of six items addressing fear of becoming addicted to pain medication and the belief that pain medications harm the immune system. The BQ-II total had an internal consistency of 0.89, and alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.75 to 0.85. Mean (SD) scores on the total scale was 1.52 (0.73). BQ-II scores were related to measures of pain intensity and duration, mood, and QOL. Patients who used adequate analgesics for their levels of pain had lower scores on the BQ-II than did patients who used inadequate analgesics. The BQ-II is a reliable and valid measure of patient-related barriers to cancer pain management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Advances in Pain Research and Therapy
Wang, J. K. (1980) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/00000539-198002000-00022 · Cited by 2,255
Pain and Its Treatment in Outpatients with Metastatic Cancer
Cleeland, C. S., Gonin, R., Hatfield, A. K., Edmonson, J. H., Blum, R. H., Stewart, J. A., & Pandya, K. J. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199403033300902 · Cited by 2,019
Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases
Daut, R. L., Cleeland, C. S., & Flanery, R. C. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4 · Cited by 1,562
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,494
Self-citationde C. Williams, A. C. (1995) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(95)90016-0 · Cited by 1,470
BONICA, J. J. (1954) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-195405000-00015 · Cited by 1,464
Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties
Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/00012272-198510000-00005 · Cited by 1,123
Portenoy, R. K., & Lesage, P. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01310-0 · Cited by 1,017
Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain
Max, M. B. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530230060032 · Cited by 795
Cited by
An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement on Assessment of Pain in Older Persons
Hadjistavropoulos, T., Herr, K., Turk, D. C., Fine, P. G., Dworkin, R. H., Helme, R., Jackson, K., Parmelee, P. A., Rudy, T. E., Lynn Beattie, B., et al. (2007) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802be869 · Cited by 560
Cancer‐related chronic pain: Examining quality of life in diverse cancer survivors
Green, C. R., Hart‐Johnson, T., & Loeffler, D. R. (2011) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.25761 · Cited by 266
Facilitators and barriers in pain management for trauma patients in the chain of emergency care
Berben, S. A. A., Meijs, T. H. J. M., van Grunsven, P. M., Schoonhoven, L., & van Achterberg, T. (2012) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.029 · Cited by 105
An update on the representational approach to patient education.
Donovan, H. S., Ward, S. E., Song, M., Heidrich, S. M., Gunnarsdottir, S., & Phillips, C. M. (2007) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00178.x · Cited by 90
Self-citationCollet, J.-P., Sarmast, H., Kissoon, N., & Mosavianpour, M. (2016) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s107796 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunnarsdottir, S., Donovan, H. S., Serlin, R. C., Voge, C., & Ward, S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-396
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968116997
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient-related barriers to pain management: the barriers questionnaire II (BQ-II). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00243-9
- The paper
- Gunnarsdottir, S., Donovan, H. S., Serlin, R. C., Voge, C., & Ward, S. (2002). Patient-related barriers to pain management: the barriers questionnaire II (BQ-II). Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00243-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.