Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imaging of central itch modulation in the human brain using positron emission tomography

Mochizuki, Hideki, Tashiro, Manabu, Kano, Michiko, Sakurada, Yumiko, Itoh, Masatoshi, Yanai, Kazuhiko·2003·Pain

Abstract

The unpleasantness of itching is reduced by cooling. Although previous research suggests the presence of a central itch modulation system, there is little documentation about the modulation system in the brain. In the present study, we investigated the modulating system of the itching sensation in human brains using positron emission tomography and H(2) (15)O. The significant increases of regional cerebral blood flow caused by histamine stimuli using iontophoresis were observed in the anterior cingulate cortex (BA24), the thalamus, the parietal cortex (BA40 and BA7), the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA46) and the premotor cortex (BA6). We did not observe any changes in the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) during the itching stimulus, corresponding to the previous imaging studies concerning itching. Activation in these areas related to itching stimuli was decreased by a simultaneous stimulation of itching and cold pain (the dual stimuli), as compared to itching alone. Interestingly, the midbrain, including periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), was only activated during the dual stimuli. PAG is well known to be a modulating noxious stimulus. Here we hypothesize that the activation of PAG may also be related to the itch modulation. These findings indicate that the modified brain activities in the PAG, the cingulate, the frontal and the parietal cortex might be associated with the itch modulation in the central nervous system and that the S2 might not be primarily involved in processing the itching perception in the brain since the activity of S2 was not observed in any concentration of itching stimuli.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00249-5

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Mochizuki, H., Tashiro, M., Kano, M., Sakurada, Y., Itoh, M., & Yanai, K.
Venue
Pain
Published
2003-09
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
339-346
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081252796
Cited by
211
References
6
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging of central itch modulation in the human brain using positron emission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00249-5
The paper
Mochizuki, H., Tashiro, M., Kano, M., Sakurada, Y., Itoh, M., & Yanai, K. (2003). Imaging of central itch modulation in the human brain using positron emission tomography. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00249-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.