The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors associated with the onset and remission of chronic daily headache in a population-based study
Abstract
The etiology and prognosis of chronic daily headache (CDH) are not well understood. The aim of this study is to describe factors that predict CDH onset or remission in an adult population. Potential cases (180+ headaches per year, n=1134) and controls (two to 104 headaches per year, n=798) were interviewed two times over an average 11 months of follow-up. Factors associated with CDH prevalence at baseline were evaluated. The incidence of CDH and risk factors for onset were assessed in controls whose headache frequency increased to 180+ per year at follow-up. Prognostic factors were assessed in CDH cases whose headache frequency fell at follow-up. CDH was more common in women, in whites, and those of less education. CDH cases were more likely to be previously married (divorced, widowed, separated), obese, and report a physician diagnosis of diabetes or arthritis. At follow-up, 3% of the controls reported 180 or more headaches per year. Obesity and baseline headache frequency were significantly associated with new onset CDH. In CDH cases, the projected 1-year remission rate to less than one headache per week was 14% and to less than 180 headaches per year was 57%. A better prognosis was associated with higher education, non-white race, being married, and with diagnosed diabetes. Individuals with less than a high-school education, whites, and those who were previously married had a higher risk of CDH at baseline and reduced likelihood of remission at follow-up. New onset CDH was associated with baseline headache frequency and obesity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy
Lipton, R. B., Bigal, M. E., Diamond, M., Freitag, F., Reed, M. L., & Stewart, W. F. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21 · Cited by 2,337
Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment
May, A., & Schulte, L. H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.93 · Cited by 630
Medication-overuse headache: a worldwide problem
Diener, H.-C., & Limmroth, V. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00824-5 · Cited by 455
Modifiable risk factors for migraine progression
Bigal, M. E., & Lipton, R. B. (2006) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00577.x · Cited by 334
Migraine Progression: A Systematic Review
Buse, D. C., Greisman, J. D., Baigi, K., & Lipton, R. B. (2019) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.13459 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Scher, I. A., Stewart, F. W., Ricci, A. J., & Lipton, B. R.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-89
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1586995597
- Cited by
- 716
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors associated with the onset and remission of chronic daily headache in a population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00293-8
- The paper
- Scher, I. A., Stewart, F. W., Ricci, A. J., & Lipton, B. R. (2003). Factors associated with the onset and remission of chronic daily headache in a population-based study. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00293-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.