Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: electrophysiological evidence

Yeomans, David C, Proudfit, Herbert K·1996·Pain

Abstract

Behavioral nociceptive responses evoked by relatively high rates of noxious radiant skin heating appear to be mediated by Aδ nociceptor activation, whereas responses evoked by low rates of skin heating appear to be mediated by the activation of C-fiber nociceptors. This hypothesis was confirmed by the results of single unit recordings of Aδ and C nociceptive afferent fibers isolated from the saphenous nerves of pentobarbital anesthetized rats. Heating the hind paw skin of the rat at a relatively high rate of 6.5°C/sec activated Aδ units within 2 sec after the onset of the stimulus. This response latency is similar to the 2.5 sec latency of the foot withdrawal response to a similar stimulus. In contrast, C-fibers were only slightly activated at a longer latency of 5–6 sec. Conversely, heating the hind paw skin at a relatively low rate of 0.9°C/sec activated C-fibers, but evoked only a few action potentials in Aδ nociceptors. C-fibers began firing at a rate less than 1 Hz between 8 and 10 sec after the onset of heating and fired at a mean rate of 1.5 Hz between 10 and 12 sec, which corresponds to the latency of the foot withdrawal response. Topical application of capsaicin to the hind paw skin decreased the latency of C-fiber responses from control values of 8–12 sec to approximately 4 sec after topical capsaicin treatment. The mean latency of the foot withdrawal response to skin heating at the low rate is also reduced from control values of 12–14 sec to 4–5 sec after capsaicin treatment. In contrast, capsaicin treatment did not significantly affect the responses of Aδ nociceptors. These results support the conclusion that nociceptive foot withdrawal responses to a low rate of skin heating are mediated predominantly by the activation of C-fiber nociceptors. These results provide direct evidence that, under the conditions of these experiments, nociceptive foot withdrawal responses evoked by high rates of skin heating are primarily mediated by Aδ nociceptors, and foot withdrawal responses evoked by low rates of skin heating are primarily mediated by C-fiber nociceptors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03177-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Yeomans, D. C., & Proudfit, H. K.
Venue
Pain
Published
1996-11
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
141-150
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4246072030
Cited by
273
References
1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: electrophysiological evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03177-6
The paper
Yeomans, D. C., & Proudfit, H. K. (1996). Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: electrophysiological evidence. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03177-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.