The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental cranial pain elicited by capsaicin: a PET study
Abstract
Using a positron emission tomography (PET) study it was shown recently that in migraine without aura certain areas in the brain stem were activated during the headache state, but not in the headache free interval. It was suggested that this brain stem activation is inherent to the migraine attack itself and represents the so called 'migraine generator'. To test this hypothesis we performed an experimental pain study in seven healthy volunteers, using the same positioning in the PET scanner as in the migraine patients. A small amount of capsaicin was administered subcutaneously in the right forehead to evoke a burning painful sensation in the first division of the trigeminal nerve. Increases of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were found bilaterally in the insula, in the anterior cingulate cortex, the cavernous sinus and the cerebellum. Using the same stereotactic space limits as in the above mentioned migraine study no brain stem activation was found in the acute pain state compared to the pain free state. The increase of activation in the region of the cavernous sinus however, suggests that this structure is more likely to be involved in trigeminal transmitted pain as such, rather than in a specific type of headache as was suggested for cluster headache.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Cited by
Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000)
Peyron, R., Laurent, B., & García-Larrea, L. (2000) · Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0987-7053(00)00227-6 · Cited by 2,171
Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing
Goadsby, P. J., Holland, P. R., Martins-Oliveira, M., Hoffmann, J., Schankin, C., & Akerman, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2015 · Cited by 1,998
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Hypothalamic activation in cluster headache attacks
May, A., Bahra, A., Büchel, C., Frackowiak, R. S., & Goadsby, P. J. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)02470-2 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationBrainstem activation specific to migraine headache
Bahra, A., Matharu, M., Buchel, C., Frackowiak, R., & Goadsby, P. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04250-1 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- May, A., Kaube, H., Büchel, C., Eichten, C., Rijntjes, M., Jüptner, M., Weiller, C., & Diener, C. H.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-66
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992942075
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental cranial pain elicited by capsaicin: a PET study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00144-9
- The paper
- May, A., Kaube, H., Büchel, C., Eichten, C., Rijntjes, M., Jüptner, M., Weiller, C., & Diener, C. H. (1998). Experimental cranial pain elicited by capsaicin: a PET study. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00144-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.