The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Pain Coping Questionnaire: preliminary validation
Abstract
A new measure of coping, the Pain Coping Questionnaire (PCQ), is presented and validated in two studies of children and adolescents. Factor analyses of data from healthy children and adolescents supported eight hypothesized subscales (information seeking, problem solving, seeking social support, positive self-statements, behavioral distraction, cognitive distraction, externalizing, internalizing/catastrophizing) and three higher-order scales (approach, problem-focused avoidance, emotion-focused avoidance). The subscales and higher-order scales were internally consistent. The pain coping scales were correlated in the expected directions with children's appraisals of pain controllability, self-rated coping effectiveness, emotional distress when in pain, and among high school students, pain thresholds and functional disability. The structure and internal consistency of the PCQ were replicated in a sample of children and adolescents experiencing recurrent pain (headache, arthritis), and their parents. Relations between child- and parent-ratings of children's coping were moderate (median r=0.34). Higher levels of emotion-focused avoidance were related to more emotional distress (both samples), less coping effectiveness (headache sample), and higher levels of pain (arthritis sample). Higher levels of approach coping were related to less disability (headache sample). Other relations between approach and distraction coping and the outcome variables were generally not significant. The PCQ is a promising instrument for assessing children's pain coping strategies. The items are simple and relatively few, making it useful for assessing coping across a wide age range. It can be administered to children as young as 8 years of age in approximately 15 min.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Rosenstiel, A. K., & Keefe, F. J. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2 · Cited by 2,314
Gender variations in clinical pain experience
Unruh, A. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00214-6 · Cited by 1,550 · cited 1×
“Boys are more likely to minimize pain, which is consistent with social and cultural norms associating pain tolerance and stoicism with masculinity (Unruh, 1996).”
BackgroundThe functional disability inventory: Measuring a neglected dimension of child health status
Walker, L. S., & Greene, J. W. (1991) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/16.1.39 · Cited by 881
Coping with chronic pain: a critical review of the literature
Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Karoly, P. (1991) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(91)90216-k · Cited by 835
Control beliefs, coping efforts, and adjustment to chronic pain
Jensen, M. P., & Karoly, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.3.431 · Cited by 312
Holmes, J. A., & Stevenson, C. A. (1990) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.9.5.577 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain
Sullivan, M. J. L., Thorn, B., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Keefe, F., Martin, M., Bradley, L. A., & Lefebvre, J. C. (2001) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008 · Cited by 2,472
Keefe, F. J., Lefebvre, J. C., Egert, J. R., Affleck, G., Sullivan, M. J., & Caldwell, D. S. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00296-7 · Cited by 735
The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation
Crombez, G., Bijttebier, P., Eccleston, C., Mascagni, T., Mertens, G., Goubert, L., & Verstraeten, K. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00121-0 · Cited by 652
Eccleston, C., Crombez, G., Scotford, A., Clinch, J., & Connell, H. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.11.008 · Cited by 418
Wicksell, R. K., Melin, L., Lekander, M., & Olsson, G. L. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.11.006 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Reid, G. J., Gilbert, C. A., & McGrath, P. J.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-96
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006389565
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pain Coping Questionnaire: preliminary validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00029-3
- The paper
- Reid, G. J., Gilbert, C. A., & McGrath, P. J. (1998). The Pain Coping Questionnaire: preliminary validation. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00029-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.