Cited by 168Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationBehavioral Health and InterventionsPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting responses to self-management treatments for chronic pain: application of the pain stages of change model

Abstract

Psychological treatments emphasizing a self-management approach have become commonly accepted alternatives to medical interventions for chronic pain. Unfortunately, these approaches often fail to engage a significant portion of targeted individuals and are associated with high drop-out and relapse rates. Informed by the transtheoretical model of behavior change and the cognitive behavioral perspective on chronic pain, the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) was developed to assess readiness to adopt a self-management approach to chronic pain. Initial studies supported the reliability and validity of four distinct scales, Precontemplation, Contemplation, Action and Maintenance. The current study was designed to assess the ability of the PSOCQ to predict self-management participation and outcome. The PSOCQ and several relevant outcome measures were assessed before and after self-management treatment by 109 chronic pain patients. Profile analysis revealed that treatment completers and non-completers differed significantly across the four PSOCQ scales. Post-hoc comparisons indicated that pretreatment PSOCQ Precontemplation and Contemplation scores discriminated these two groups. Separate analyses revealed that Action and Maintenance scores increased over the course of treatment, and that changes in the PSOCQ scales were associated with improved outcomes. These findings suggest that increased commitment to a self-management approach to chronic pain may serve as a mediator…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00184-0

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Turner, 1984, Self-report screening measures for depression in chronic pain patients. J. Clin., Psychol, 40, 909

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–168 of 168

Metadata

Authors
Kerns, R. D., & Rosenberg, R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Kerns, Robert D.
Venue
Pain
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
49-55
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033853365
Cited by
168
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • McGill University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pain, self-management, transtheoretical model, stages of change, treatment discontinuation, treatment outcome prediction, precontemplation, contemplation, treatment engagement
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review