The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The exercise and valuation of executive stock options
Open accessAbstract
In theory, hedging restrictions faced by managers make executive stock options more difficult to value than ordinary options, because they imply that exercise policies of managers depend on their preferences and endowments. Using data on option exercises from 40 firms, this paper shows that a simple extension of the ordinary American option model which introduces random, exogenous exercise and forfeiture predicts actual exercise times and payoffs just as well as an elaborate utility-maximizing model that explicitly accounts for the nontransferability of options. The simpler model could therefore be more useful than the preference-based model for valuing executive options in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260062 · Cited by 29,074
Theory of rational option pricing
Merton, R. C. (2005) · Theory of Valuation · doi:10.1142/9789812701022_0008 · Cited by 7,161
Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model
Merton, R. C. (1971) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-x · Cited by 5,958
Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case
Merton, R. C. (1969) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926560 · Cited by 5,187
Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets
Harrison, J. M., & Kreps, D. M. (1979) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(79)90043-7 · Cited by 3,593
The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes
Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90023-4 · Cited by 2,934
Hart, O., & Holmström, B. (1987) · Advances in Economic Theory · doi:10.1017/ccol0521340446.003 · Cited by 1,330
Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively?
Yermack, D. (1995) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(95)00829-4 · Cited by 1,128
Portfolio Considerations in Valuing Executive Compensation
Lamber, R. A., Larcker, D. F., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2491032 · Cited by 843
Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions
AGRAWAL, A., & MANDELKER, G. N. (1987) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb03914.x · Cited by 714
Cited by
Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction☆
MALMENDIER, U., & TATE, G. (2008) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002 · Cited by 2,754
Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
Hall, B. J., & Liebman, J. B. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555702 · Cited by 1,308
Frydman, C., & Jenter, D. (2010) · Annual Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-financial-120209-133958 · Cited by 542
Lower Salaries and No Options? On the Optimal Structure of Executive Pay
DITTMANN, I., & MAUG, E. (2007) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01208.x · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, J. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Financial Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-158
- ISSN
- 0304-405X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164335397
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 31.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The exercise and valuation of executive stock options. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00006-3
- The paper
- Carpenter, J. N. (1998). The exercise and valuation of executive stock options. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00006-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.