The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of ammonia in seawater by the indophenol-blue method: Evaluation of the ICES NUTS I/C 5 questionnaire
Abstract
Abstract Replies to the questionnaire on the determination of ammonia, sent to participants in the Fifth ICES Intercomparison Exercise for nutrients in seawater, are evaluated. The conclusions provide some useful recommendations for analysts. Berthelot's reaction (formation of indophenol-blue) is the basis of the colorimetry used by the great majority of participants, and their individual methods are examined in detail. Application of the indophenol-blue method to seawater poses some specific problems, for example, precipitation, and variation of the pH of the matrix as a function of salinity. Basic principles are discussed and participants' procedures are compared with those most commonly used in the literature. Large disparities in reaction and operating conditions are evident between these many versions of what is nominally the same method. Various points of the reaction mechanism are examined in order to determine optimal ranges for reagent concentrations. Procedures for calibration, measuring the blank, and defining the concentration-zero are also evaluated, as the intercomparison results indicate that systematic (particularly relative) errors are widespread. The use of low-nutrient seawater as a calibration matrix is strongly recommended if errors such as those incurred by the use of demineralised water or artificial seawater are to be avoided. Sources of contamination are discussed, the majority of participants being aware that ambient laboratory air can be a major problem. In general, users of automated methods produce better results than users of manual methods, but this may simply reflect a tendency for the former to be the more experienced analysts. Although it was not possible consistently to relate performance in the intercomparison with methodology, it would appear that many procedures deviate from optimal operating conditions, while some are unnecessarily complicated and might benefit from simplification. Analysts are invited to re-examine their ammonia methods, with particular attention to suitability of reagents and reaction conditions, use of adequate blank and calibration procedures and matrices, correction for refraction effects and identification of local contamination sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A simple and precise method for measuring ammonium in marine and freshwater ecosystems
Holmes, R. M., Aminot, A., Kérouel, R., Hooker, B., & Peterson, B. J. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-56-10-1801 · Cited by 1,376
Self-citationSantoro, A. E., Casciotti, K. L., & Francis, C. A. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02205.x · Cited by 398
Holmes, R. M., McClelland, J. W., Sigman, D. M., Fry, B., & Peterson, B. J. (1998) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0304-4203(97)00099-6 · Cited by 366
Metabolomics-driven quantitative analysis of ammonia assimilation in E. coli
Yuan, J., Doucette, C. D., Fowler, W. U., Feng, X., Piazza, M., Rabitz, H. A., Wingreen, N. S., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2009) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2009.60 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Aminot, A., Kirkwood, D. S., & Kérouel, R.
- Venue
- Marine Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 59-75
- ISSN
- 0304-4203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073433356
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of ammonia in seawater by the indophenol-blue method: Evaluation of the ICES NUTS I/C 5 questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-4203(96)00080-1
- The paper
- Aminot, A., Kirkwood, D. S., & Kérouel, R. (1997). Determination of ammonia in seawater by the indophenol-blue method: Evaluation of the ICES NUTS I/C 5 questionnaire. Marine Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4203(96)00080-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.