Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determination of ammonia in seawater by the indophenol-blue method: Evaluation of the ICES NUTS I/C 5 questionnaire

Aminot, A., Kirkwood, D.S., Kérouel, R.·1997·Marine Chemistry

Abstract

Abstract Replies to the questionnaire on the determination of ammonia, sent to participants in the Fifth ICES Intercomparison Exercise for nutrients in seawater, are evaluated. The conclusions provide some useful recommendations for analysts. Berthelot's reaction (formation of indophenol-blue) is the basis of the colorimetry used by the great majority of participants, and their individual methods are examined in detail. Application of the indophenol-blue method to seawater poses some specific problems, for example, precipitation, and variation of the pH of the matrix as a function of salinity. Basic principles are discussed and participants' procedures are compared with those most commonly used in the literature. Large disparities in reaction and operating conditions are evident between these many versions of what is nominally the same method. Various points of the reaction mechanism are examined in order to determine optimal ranges for reagent concentrations. Procedures for calibration, measuring the blank, and defining the concentration-zero are also evaluated, as the intercomparison results indicate that systematic (particularly relative) errors are widespread. The use of low-nutrient seawater as a calibration matrix is strongly recommended if errors such as those incurred by the use of demineralised water or artificial seawater are to be avoided. Sources of contamination are discussed, the majority of participants being aware that ambient laboratory air can be a major problem. In general, users of automated methods produce better results than users of manual methods, but this may simply reflect a tendency for the former to be the more experienced analysts. Although it was not possible consistently to relate performance in the intercomparison with methodology, it would appear that many procedures deviate from optimal operating conditions, while some are unnecessarily complicated and might benefit from simplification. Analysts are invited to re-examine their ammonia methods, with particular attention to suitability of reagents and reaction conditions, use of adequate blank and calibration procedures and matrices, correction for refraction effects and identification of local contamination sources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-4203(96)00080-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Aminot, A., Kirkwood, D. S., & Kérouel, R.
Venue
Marine Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-02
Volume
56
Issue
1-2
Pages
59-75
ISSN
0304-4203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073433356
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of ammonia in seawater by the indophenol-blue method: Evaluation of the ICES NUTS I/C 5 questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-4203(96)00080-1
The paper
Aminot, A., Kirkwood, D. S., & Kérouel, R. (1997). Determination of ammonia in seawater by the indophenol-blue method: Evaluation of the ICES NUTS I/C 5 questionnaire. Marine Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4203(96)00080-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.