The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning from mistakes
Abstract
We re-examine the commonly held view that learning and memory necessarily require potentiation of synapses. A simple neuronal model of self-organized learning with no positive reinforcement is presented. The strongest synapses are selected for propagation of activity. Active synaptic connections are temporarily "tagged" and subsequently depressed if the resulting output turns out to be unsuccessful. Thus, all learning occurs by mistakes. The model operates at a highly adaptive state with low activity. Previously stored patterns may be swiftly retrieved when the environment and the demands of the brain change. The combined process of: (i) activity selection by extremal "winner-take-all" dynamics; and (ii) the subsequent weeding out of synapses may be viewed as synaptic Darwinism. We argue that all the features of the model are biologically plausible and discuss our results in light of recent experiments by Fitzsimonds et al. on back-propagation of long-term depression, by Xu et al. on facilitation of long-term depression in the hippocampus by behavioural stress, and by Frey and Morris on synaptic tagging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation
Frey, U., & Morris, R. G. M. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385533a0 · Cited by 1,736
Gould, E., Tanapat, P., McEwen, B. S., Flügge, G., & Fuchs, E. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.6.3168 · Cited by 1,395
Cited by
Emergent complex neural dynamics
Chialvo, D. R. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1803 · Cited by 1,165
Self-citationLong-Range Temporal Correlations and Scaling Behavior in Human Brain Oscillations
Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Nikouline, V. V., Palva, J. M., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-04-01370.2001 · Cited by 1,149
“From a theoretical point of view and based on simulations, it has been argued that a state of criticality would be optimal for a network to swiftly adapt to new situations (Alstrøm and Stassinopoulos 1995; Stassinopoulos and Bak, 1995; Bonabeau, 1997; Chialvo and Bak, 1999).”
BackgroundThe Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex
Shew, W. L., & Plenz, D. (2013) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858412445487 · Cited by 607
The criticality hypothesis: how local cortical networks might optimize information processing
Beggs, J. M. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2092 · Cited by 533
Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain
Beggs, J. M., & Timme, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00163 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Chialvo, D. R., & Bak, P.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1137-1148
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994810932
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning from mistakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00472-2
- The paper
- Chialvo, D. R., & Bak, P. (1999). Learning from mistakes. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00472-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.