CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the web

Liu, Ziming·2004·Information Processing & Management
DOI 10.1016/s0306-4573(03)00064-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4573(03)00064-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Austin, 1994, Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability, Journalism Quarterly, 71, 973, 10.1177/107769909407100420 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beltramini, 1993, Comprehension and perceived believability of seals of approval information in advertising, Journal of Advertising, 22, 3, 10.1080/00913367.1993.10673407 · DOI
  3. Burbules, 2001, Paradoxes of the web: The ethical dimensions of credibility, Library Trends, 49, 441
  4. Hart, 2003, Trust in the preservation of digital information, Communications of the ACM, 46, 93, 10.1145/777313.777319 · DOI
  5. Hawkins, 1999, What is credible information?, Online, 23, 213
  6. Herring, 2001, Using the World Wide Web for research: Are faculty satisfied?, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27, 213, 10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00183-5 · DOI
  7. Jadad, 1998, Rating health information on the Internet: Navigating to knowledge or to Babel?, Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 611, 10.1001/jama.279.8.611 · DOI
  8. Lynch, 2001, When documents deceive: Trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 12, 10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<12::AID-ASI1062>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  9. Maloney, 1994, Is advertising believability really important?, Marketing Management, 3, 47
  10. Rieh, 2002, Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145, 10.1002/asi.10017 · DOI
  11. Tseng, 1999, Credibility and computing technology, Communications of the ACM, 42, 39, 10.1145/301353.301402 · DOI
  12. Wathen, 2002, Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 134, 10.1002/asi.10016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Z.
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
1027-1038
ISSN
0306-4573
DOI
10.1016/s0306-4573(03)00064-5
Cited by
87
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review