Cited by 107Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and CessationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Inconsistencies in adolescents’ self-reports of initiation of alcohol and tobacco use

Engels, Rutger C.M.E., Knibbe, Ronald A., Drop, Maria J.·1997·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

This study focuses on errors in estimations of age at which alcohol and tobacco are used for the first time. The data come from a 5-year longitudinal study with three measurements. Self-reports about age of first use at the baseline measurement were compared with similar self-reports at two follow-up surveys. Adolescents were more likely to report a higher age of first use at follow-up measurements. Those who at the baseline measurement reported having smoked (n = 338) or consumed alcohol (n = 523) 61.7% and 89%, respectively, underestimated their years of use. By comparison with estimations at the first and third measurement, 13.6% for smoking and 4.6% for drinking were consistent about their age of first use. Self-reports about the age of onset at the baseline measurement were correlated with frequency and intensity of tobacco and alcohol use 5 years later to assess the predictive power of age of onset for later use. With one exception (correlation with intensity of alcohol use 5 years later, r = .14) no significant correlation was found. The results show that the concept age of first use should be utilized with caution for two reasons: (1) the reliability of assessment is insufficient, and (2) correlations of different estimates with actual frequency and intensity of consumption at the third wave are inconsistent. Explanations for errors in measurement, and recommendations for improvement, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4603(96)00067-6

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies of adolescents have found that estimates of the age of first use do tend to increase upon repeat assessment, but the rank ordering for the different drugs remains the same.

    “Longitudinal studies of adolescents have found that estimates of the age of first use do tend to increase upon repeat assessment (i.e. as people age) ([Engels et al., 1997](#R11); [Henry et al., 1994](#R16); [Labouvie et al., 1997](#R23)), but the rank ordering for the different drugs remains the same ([Engels et al., 1997](#R11); [Henry et al., 1994](#R16); [Labouvie et al., 1997](#R23)).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engels, R. C. M. E., Knibbe, R. A., & Drop, M. J.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Engels, Rutger C.M.E.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-09
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
613-623
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008786675
Cited by
107
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
age at first use, alcohol initiation, tobacco initiation, adolescents, self-report reliability, measurement error, underreporting, smoking, alcohol consumption, longitudinal consistency
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Netherlands, Sampling Studies, Smoking, Reproducibility of Results, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review